Космополитизм как проблема современной социальной теории (стр. 12 )

28.  ХАБЕРМАС, Ю. Этика дискурса: замечания к программе обоснования. В: ХАБЕРМАС, Ю. Моральное сознание и коммуникативное действие. М.: НАУКА/ИНТЕРПЕРИОДИКА МАИК, 2006.

29.  ШМИДТ, К. Понятие политического (фрагменты). Вопросы со­циологии. 1992. № 1. С. 37—67.

30.  ШЮЦ, А. Феноменология и социальные науки. В: ШЮЦ, А. Мир, светящийся смыслом. М.: Российская политическая энциклопедия, 2004.

31.  APPADURAI, A. Modernity at Large. Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1996.

32.  ARENDT, H. Crisis in Culture. In: ARENDT, H. Between Past and Future: 3ix Exercises in Political Thought, New York: Meridian Books, 2006.

33.  BECK, U. Cosmopolitanization - now! An interview with Ulrich Beck. Theory, Culture & Society, Vol. 18 (4). 2001.

34.  BECK, U. Cosmopolis and Risk: A Conversation with Ulrich Beck. Theory, Culture & Society, Vol. 18 (4). 2001.

35.  CASTELLS, M. The Power of Identity. Malden, MA: Blackwell. 1997.

36.  CHEAH, P. Cosmopolitanism. Theory, Culture Society, №23 (486). 2006.

37.  FINE, R. Kant’s theory of cosmopolitanism and Hegel’s critique. Philosophy & Social Criticism №29 (609). 2003.

38.  GIDDENS, A. Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Polity Press, 1997.

39.  HALL, S. The Question of Cultural Identity. In: HALL, S; HELD, D; HUBERT, D.; THOMPSON, K. (eds). Modernity: An Introduction to Modern Societies. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1995.

40.  HELD, D. Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance. Blackwell Publishers, 1995.

41.  HELD, D. Globalization, Cosmopolitanism, and Democracy: An Interview with David Held. Blackwell Publishers, 2001.

42.  ROUDOMETOF, V. Transnationalism, Cosmopolitanism and Glocalization. Current Sociology №53 (113). 2005.

43.  STEVENSON, N. European Cosmopolitan Solidarity: Questions of Citizenship, Difference and Post-Materialism. European Journal of Social Theory, №9 (485). 2006.

44.  SZNAIDER, N. Hannah Arendt's Jewish Cosmopolitanism: Between the Universal and the Particular. European Journal of Social Theory №10 (112). 2007

45.  LACLAU, E. Universalism, Particularism and the Question of Identity. In: RAJCHMAN, J. (ed.) The Identity in Question. New York: Routledge, 1995.

46.  LINKLATER, A. Citizenship, Humanity, and Cosmopolitan Harm Conventions. International Political Science Review №22 (261). 2001.

47.  PICHLER, F. How Real Is Cosmopolitanism in Europe? Sociology № 6, 2008

48.  URRY, J. Sociology beyond Societies: Mobilities for the Twenty-First Century. London and New York: Routledge, 2000.

49.  ZAKARAS, A. Isaiah Berlin's Cosmopolitan Ethics. Political Theory, №32 (495). 2004.

Cosmopolitanism as the problem of the contemporary social theory

(summary)

The main purpose of this Bachelor thesis is to reveal problem components of classical sociology and policy which are based on container representation about a society, and to reveal therapeutic methods for the decision of the given problems, considered within the limits of contemporary discussion about cosmopolitanism.

Structurally this Paper is divided into three basic parts: (1) revealing classical representation of cosmopolitanism and the present day urgency for discussion about cosmopolitism, (2) consideration of the concept of contemporary societies cosmopolitanization and cosmopolitan sociology (3) revealing the importance of the cosmopolitan democracy concept for formation of the general cosmopolitan future.

The author revealed the features of classical representation of cosmopolitanism in Immanuel Kant’s works in quality an example of possibility of discussion about cosmopolitanism in formation of the national states. Further the author ascertained the urgency for working out cosmopolitanism concepts within the limits of social reality in the second modernity. In this connection cosmopolitan projects were presented as those transformations which are capable to restore the importance of a local context, having included it in processes of global transformations. Further the author represents the description of variety of contemporary concepts of cosmopolitanism. First of all the author addressed to the description of cosmopolitan ethics understanding by Marta Nussbaum. Further the author defined the basic lines of cosmopolitanism interpretation in Ulrich Beck’s works: the understanding of cosmopolitanization as cosmopolitan transformation of contemporary societies and project of cosmopolitan sociology as necessities of creation of knowledge, relevant for such social reality. In this сonnection the concept of cosmopolitan democracy as relevant project for the decision of the problems сconnected with liberalism crisis and national focused policy were presented. Further the criticism of the concept of cosmopolitan democracy by Chantal Mouffe was analyzed. This research has shown that the project of radical democracy and cosmopolitan approaches to democratic processes not so the distant friend from the friend as Mouffe sees it.

This research has revealed that the project of cosmopolitan sociology by Ulrich Beck and the concept of cosmopolitan democracy by David Held are relevant for contemporary sociology transformation and policy concerning realization of the general cosmopolitan future.

On the basis of this Bachelor thesis, there was made a discourse during the international scientific conference «Europe 2009: The new neighbourhood» in European Humanities University (May, 2006), and a scientific article «Cosmopolitanism as a way of life» was published in collected articles of this conference. Later a second discourse «Cosmopolitan citizenship» was made during in the international scientific conference «Europe 2009: The new neighbourhood».