Scientific and medical expertise in quality provision system of scientific researches in health sphere (Methodical recommendations) (стр. 3 )

Conclusion of

scientific and medical expertise on project of scientific and technical program

Name of scientific and technical program: _______________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________

Organization-applicant: ________________________________________________________

Scientific adviser: ________________________________________________________

Execution period: ____________________________________________________________

Financing amount (grant, purposeful-program):_________________________

Name of criteria/indicator	Properties of criterion/indicator	Mark	Mark results
1.  Scientific quality	Novelty degree (level) of proposed approaches and ways of problem solution
1.1. Level of scientific novelty
High	Research problem is stated and scientifically based for the first time, research in stated direction before aren’t conducted, supposed way of research problem solution before aren’t used	7—10
Relatively high	Original approaches are offered to research problem solution in project, which allow to modernize present ways of problem solution	4––6
Insufficiency high	Proposed approaches to decision of research problem substantially aren’t differentiated from having and haven’t novelty and originality.	1––3
Absence	Novelty and originality are absent to problem decision in proposed approaches	0
1.2. Quality of expressed question/ research problems	Quality of presented research conception
High	Exact research conception. Name and purpose fully are opened the scientific novelty and actuality of planning research	7—10
Relatively high	Research conception is revealed insufficiency extensively. Name and purpose are not in full measure to discover the scientific novelty and actuality of planning research	4––6
Insufficiency high	Weak research conception. Name and purpose practically aren’t opened the scientific novelty and actuality of planning research	1––3
Absence	Absence of research conception. Name and purpose aren’t opened the scientific novelty and actuality of planning research	0
1.3. Quality of project STP compilation	Conformity of project structure and content by stationery requirements
High	Necessary parts are opened in the project: actuality, purpose, tasks, design of research and others. High scientific style of writing project.	7—10
Relatively high	Necessary parts are in project, but they are opened in insufficiency volume. Having little remarks on scientific stylistics of writing project.	4––6
Insufficiency high	Necessary parts contain in project, but they practically aren’t open. Having present remarks on scientific stylistics of writing project.	1––3
Absence	Number of necessary parts is absent in project, having parts practically aren’t opened. Having significant stylistic and spelling mistakes	0
2. Significance for science and practice	Potentially possible influence level of planning result on further development of medical science and health practice
2.1. Expected results influence degree of on science and practice
High	Cardinal influence is rendered on science and practice further development, allowed to decide one of key problems under one of priority directions in health branch	7––10
Relatively high	Important influence is rendered on science and practice further development, allowed essentially advance in solution of key problems under one of priority directions in health branch	4––6
Insufficiency high	Defined influence is rendered on science and practice further development, allowed to base for solution of present problems in health branch	1––3
Absence	It has not importance for science and practice	0
2. 2. Actuality of planning STP	Conformity degree to inquiries of science and practice
High	Decision of stated problems in project is paramount and primary tasks for modern medical science and practice	7––10
Relatively high	Solution of stated problems in project is important task for modern medical science and practice	4––6
Insufficiency high	Solution of stated problems in project is one of local tasks for modern medical science and practice	1––3
Not actually	Doesn’t conform to inquires and tasks of science and practice	0
2.3. Expected effect level estimation from implementation	Expected effect from implementation: -medical and prophylactic, -social, -economic, -scientific	Presence at some kinds of effect in effect sum mustn’t increase 10 marks
High	Wide implementation in republic with significant effect	7––10
Relatively high	Implementation in some organizations with significant effect	4—6
Insufficiency high	Implementation in one organization without effect identification	1––3
Absence	Implementation doesn’t plan Doesn’t reveal	0
3. Objectivity	Validity degree estimation of research results: methodic level of conducted research and material technical base of researcher
3.1. Results evidentiary degree
High	Researched the modern methods, equipment, reagents	7––10
Relatively high	Level of used methods, equipment, reagents is sufficiently high	4––6
Insufficiency high	Level of used reagents, methods, equipment will not provide high results level	1––3
Low	The used methods, equipment, reagents will not provide achievements to stated purpose	0
3.2. Basic executors qualification	Qualification estimation degree of basic executors on research theme
High	Sufficient for objective execution – for 70-100% executors	7––10
Relatively high	Sufficient for objective execution – for 40-69% executors	4––6
Insufficiency high	Sufficient for objective execution – less than 39% executors	1––3
Absence	Insufficient	0
3.3. Backlog presence	Readiness level of executors to tasks decision, assigned in project, estimable on results of previous work
Significant backlog	Presence of positive results, which confirm the rightness of chosen direction, presence of publications on research theme	7––10
Definite backlog	Presence of paramount material, which confirm the rightness of chosen direction, research methods are assimilated	4––6
Minimal backlog	Research methods are assimilated	1––3
Backlog absence	Backlog are absent on research theme	0
3.4. Period execution validity of STP	Execution possibility of stages and arrangements on project realization, is showed by elaborator to planning periods
High	It conforms to planning periods	7––10
Relatively high	Execution period is overstated from moment or understated on required data not more than 50%	4––6
Insufficiency high	Execution period is overstated from moment or understated on required data more than 50%	1––3
Absence	Execution period is not validated	0
3.5.Financial validity of STP	Sum conformity are required by elaborator on project realization, to stated arrangements volume
High	Fully conforms to research volumes and tasks	7––10
Relatively high	Required finance is overstated the cost of planning work volumes or insufficiency on potentially necessary sum not more than 50%	4––6
Insufficiency high	Required finance is overstated the cost of planning work volumes or insufficiency on potentially necessary sum more than 50%	1––3
Absence	Financial validity STP is absent	0
TOTAL:

Concrete remarks on project: ____________________________________________________