Scientific and medical expertise in quality provision system of scientific researches in health sphere (Methodical recommendations) (стр. 4 )

__________________________________________________________________________________

Presence or absence of circumstances which complicate the objective expertise: _____________ __________________________________________________________________________________

Conclusion: ________________________________________________________________________

The Chairman of Expert Group

Council of expert commission

Secretary

Приложение №3

Expert mark scale of completed STP

Name of criteria/indicator	Properties of criterion/indicator	Mark in points
1.  Scientific quality	Novelty degree (level) of proposed approaches and ways of problem solution
1.1. Level of scientific novelty
High	Research before is not conducted in stated direction, used way of research problem solution before is not accepted	7—10
Relatively high	Original approaches to decision of present problem are proposed, which allow to modernize the present ways of problem solution	4––6
Insufficiency high	Used approaches to research problem substantially are not differentiate from having and haven’t explicit novelty and originality.	1––3
Absence	Novelty and originality are absent in proposed approaches to problem solution	0
1.2. Scientific level of results received	It represents the degree of stated research problem/ issue solution
High	Stated research problem/issue is decided, receiving results are exceed the level of having decisions	7—10
Relatively high	Stated research problem/issue is decided partially, receiving results are on the level of having decisions	4––6
Insufficiency high	Stated research problem/issue is decided weakly, receiving results are inferior to the level of having decisions	1––3
Absence	Stated research problem/issue solution is absent	0
1.3. Quality of project STP compilation	Conformity of report structure and content to set requirements
High	Necessary sections are represented fully in report – introduction, materials and methods, research results and their discussion, conclusion. High scientific style of writing report	7—10
Relatively high	Necessary sections are in report, but they are represented in insufficiency volume. Some remarks are having on scientific stylistics of writing report.	4––6
Insufficiency high	Necessary sections are in report, but they are not represented practically. Some remarks are having on scientific stylistics of writing report.	1––3
Absence	Necessary sections are absent in report, having sections are not represented practically. Significant stylistic and spelling mistakes are having.	0
2. Significance for science and practice	Influence degree (level) of receiving results on further development of medical science and health practice
2.1. Degree of scientific significance
High	Cardinal influence has on further development of science and practice, which allow to decide one of key problems under one of priority directions in health branch	7––10
Relatively high	Important influence has on further development of science and practice, which allow to advance substantially in solution of key problem under one of priority directions in health branch	4––6
Insufficiency high	Definite influence has on science and practice development, which allow to lay the base for solution of present problems in health branch	1––3
Absence	It has not importance for science and practice	0
2. 2. Significance for practice	Conformity degree to inquiries of practical health
High	Received results have the paramount and primary meaning for modern practical health	7––10
Relatively high	Received results have the important meaning for modern practical health	4––6
Insufficiency high	Received results have definite (local) meaning for modern practical health	1––3
Absence	It has not meaning for practice development	0
2.3. Level and volumes of implementation	Received and/or expected effect from implementation: -medical and prophylactic, -social, -economic, -scientific	Presence at some kinds of effect in effect sum mustn’t increase 10 marks
High	Wide implementation in republic with significant effect	7––10
Relatively high	Implementation in some organizations with significant effect	4—6
Insufficiency high	Implementation in one organization without effect identification	1––3
Absence	Implementation doesn’t plan, doesn’t reveal	0
3. Objectivity	Validity degree estimation of research results: conclusion, summary and recommendations
3.1.Results evidentiary degree
High	Research results are received with usage of modern methods, equipment, reagents	7––10
Relatively high	Level of used methods, equipment, reagents are sufficiency high and substantially doesn’t influence on final results	4––6
Insufficiency high	Research results have low evidentiary base as a result of high level of used methods, equipment, reagents	1––3
Low	Used methods, equipment, reagents didn’t provide achievements of stated purpose	0
3.2. Conformity to the plan STP	Execution degree of project required tasks
High	All arrangements are executed in period	7––10
Relatively high	Tasks are executed partially, having lag is inessential	4––6
Insufficiency high	Tasks are executed partially, have present lag	1––3
Absence	Stated arrangements are not executed	0
3.3 Implementation of results received	Transfer level of received knowledge and technologies in practical health and medical science
High	Research results are implemented fully and use	7––10
Relatively high	Research results are used partially	4––6
Insufficiency high	Preparation to usage and/or results commercialization is proceeding	1––3
Absence	Perspectives of usage and/or results commercialization are unclear	0

Application №4

Conclusion of

scientific and medical report expertise of scientific and technical program

Name of scientific and technical program: _______________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________

Organization-applicant: ________________________________________________________

Scientific adviser: ________________________________________________________

Execution period: ____________________________________________________________

Financing amount (grant, purposeful-program):_________________________

Name of criteria/indicator	Properties of criterion/indicator	Mark in points	Mark results
1.  Scientific quality	Novelty degree (level) of proposed approaches and ways of problem solution
1.1. Level of scientific novelty
High	Research before is not conducted in stated direction, used way of research problem solution before is not accepted	7—10
Relatively high	Original approaches to decision of present problem are proposed, which allow to modernize the present ways of problem solution	4––6
Insufficiency high	Used approaches to research problem substantially are not differentiate from having and haven’t explicit novelty and originality.	1––3
Absence	Novelty and originality are absent in proposed approaches to problem solution	0
1.2. Scientific level of results received	It represents the degree of stated research problem/ issue solution
High	Stated research problem/issue is decided, receiving results are exceed the level of having decisions	7—10
Relatively high	Stated research problem/issue is decided partially, receiving results are on the level of having decisions	4––6
Insufficiency high	Stated research problem/issue is decided weakly, receiving results are inferior to the level of having decisions	1––3
Absence	Stated research problem/issue solution is absent	0
1.3. Quality of project STP compilation	Conformity of report structure and content to set requirements
High	Necessary sections are represented fully in report – introduction, materials and methods, research results and their discussion, conclusion. High scientific style of writing report	7—10
Relatively high	Necessary sections are in report, but they are represented in insufficiency volume. Some remarks are having on scientific stylistics of writing report.	4––6
Insufficiency high	Necessary sections are in report, but they are not represented practically. Some remarks are having on scientific stylistics of writing report.	1––3
Absence	Necessary sections are absent in report, having sections are not represented practically. Significant stylistic and spelling mistakes are having.	0
2. Significance for science and practice	Influence degree (level) of receiving results on further development of medical science and health practice
2.1. Degree of scientific significance
High	Cardinal influence has on further development of science and practice, which allow to decide one of key problems under one of priority directions in health branch	7––10
Relatively high	Important influence has on further development of science and practice, which allow to advance substantially in solution of key problem under one of priority directions in health branch	4––6
Insufficiency high	Definite influence has on science and practice development, which allow to lay the base for solution of present problems in health branch	1––3
Absence	It has not importance for science and practice	0
2. 2. Significance for practice	Conformity degree to inquiries of practical health
High	Received results have the paramount and primary meaning for modern practical health	7––10
Relatively high	Received results have the important meaning for modern practical health	4––6
Insufficiency high	Received results have definite (local) meaning for modern practical health	1––3
Absence	It has not meaning for practice development	0
2.3. Level and volumes of implementation	Received and/or expected effect from implementation: -medical and prophylactic, -social, -economic, -scientific	Presence at some kinds of effect in effect sum mustn’t increase 10 marks
High	Wide implementation in republic with significant effect	7––10
Relatively high	Implementation in some organizations with significant effect	4—6
Insufficiency high	Implementation in one organization without effect identification	1––3
Absence	Implementation doesn’t plan, doesn’t reveal	0
3. Objectivity	Validity degree estimation of research results: conclusion, summary and recommendations
3.1.Results evidentiary degree
High	Research results are received with usage of modern methods, equipment, reagents	7––10
Relatively high	Level of used methods, equipment, reagents are sufficiency high and substantially doesn’t influence on final results	4––6
Insufficiency high	Research results have low evidentiary base as a result of high level of used methods, equipment, reagents	1––3
Low	Used methods, equipment, reagents didn’t provide achievements of stated purpose	0
3.2. Conformity to the plan STP	Execution degree of project required tasks
High	All arrangements are executed in period	7––10
Relatively high	Tasks are executed partially, having lag is inessential	4––6
Insufficiency high	Tasks are executed partially, have present lag	1––3
Absence	Stated arrangements are not executed	0
3.3 Implementation of results received	Transfer level of received knowledge and technologies in practical health and medical science
High	Research results are implemented fully and use	7––10
Relatively high	Research results are used partially	4––6
Insufficiency high	Preparation to usage and/or results commercialization is proceeding	1––3
Absence	Perspectives of usage and/or results commercialization are unclear	0

Concrete remarks on report: ____________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________

Presence or absence of circumstances which complicate the objective expertise: _____________ __________________________________________________________________________________

Conclusion: ________________________________________________________________________

The Chairman of Expert Group

Council of expert commission

Secretary