Набат (стр. 4 )

Россия выносит для обсуждения на мировую арены целый ряд первоклассных инициатив-проектов. Они различны по масштабам, их всех объединяет нацеленность на мировую гармонизацию, на равновесие и баланс интересов. Среди них и консолидация мировых ресурсов для целей национального развития (это сугубо важно для всех стран мира!), Здесь и региональные проблемы, в частности, «Большого Севера, где в центре внимания преодоление геополитического «неврозоа» и опасности силовых разборок, и, как альтернатиа, - выход на конструктивный геоэкономический диалог; и внимание к связке «Европейский Союз – Россия». Убедительно звучит провозглашение зоны стран Содружества Независимых Государств в качестве геоэкономического ареала мирового роста и воспроизводственного сотрудничества. Мир узнал о новейших отраслевых российских инициативах: формировании глобальной кластерно–сетевой энергетической системы – ЭНЕРГОНЕТа, а в области транспорта - ТРАНСНЕТа. А возьмите российские прорывы в сферу нового гуманитарного знания: геонауки – геоэкономика, глобалистика, геофинансы, гуманитарнуя космология. Они уже стали достоянием мировой научной мысли и на их базе формируется «Большой проект» – выход к Мирозданию нового Ренессанса. Все эти «большие» инициативы не для «большого» красного слова, или разговора ради ни к чему не обязывающего разговора – они ведут к «большому» делу! Придать деловую прагматическую окраску своим инициативам - отличительная российская черта.

* * *

Россия спокойным и критичным взглядом осматривает мировой ландшафт как мировое проблемное поле диалога и останавливает свой взор на мировых ареалах и точках, где решается судьба современного мира, закладываются его новые исторические страницы. Россия участвует в их «написании».

Российская прагматика, реалистичный подход к решению острых мировых проблем вписывается в общую мировую тенденцию по снятию посредством мирового дискурса огромного накопившегося слоя геополитической, идеологической и цивилизационной суеты и трескотни вокруг них, долгое время опутывавших мир бесконечными разборками на межах ячеистого сознания, и на межах ячеистой международной карты мира, приводящим к кровавым войнам по причинам недоговоренности, недопонимания, а, зачастую, просто зашоренности и нежелания понимать другую сторону. Всей этой паутине, опоясавшей и человека, и мировое сообщество, и мировую систему приходит конец. Она снимается, как снимается паутина в старом, захламленном доме. И у России в руках для этого надежный и мощный инструментарий - Диалогистика. Она как путеводная книга сопровождает Россию. Россия двинулась в неудержимый геоэкономический поход, меняющий мировую ситуацию и глобальную расстановку сил - совместное обустройство ареалов и точек мирового роста как залога стратегического равновесия на почве балансов интересов. Тем самым Россия открывает новую страницу глобального диалога на путях к безопасному миру, благополучия каждого человека, его семьи и его страны.

Пути решения цивилизационных, гуманитарных и экономических проблем современного общества пролегают через диалог. Умение договариваться есть наука, большая, фундаментальная! Новая! К осознанию этого человек шел долго, мучительно, через пробы и ошибки – трагические ошибки! В современном, тесно взаимоувязанном мире любые шаги (инициативы, проекты, программы) рано или поздно попадают на «мировой стол»: здесь в них пристально всматриваются и задаются вопросом – «к чему бы это?». Особенно в период кризисов, когда до предела обостряются старые проблемы, добавляются к ним новые. От них уже не отмахнуться! Наступает время осознания проблемного «поля» диалога, время «больших решений»! Понимание этого набирает обороты.

Пришло реальное осознание необходимости фундаментального поворота в понимании категории «диалог». Интеллектуальная мысль, выдвинув парадигмальную связку «геоэкономика – глобалистика – гуманитарная космология» в качестве действенного рычага по гармонизации нашего мира, выходит на новый рубеж: концептуализацию глобальной теории диалога цивилизаций. Общий контур решения этой проблемы уже просматривается: новая отрасль знания «диалогистика» закладывает теоретические и методологические основы диалога в современном мире на всех его уровнях позиционирования участников *.

__________________

* От редакции. На девятой сессии Родосского форума 6-10 октября 2011 года была представлена книга Эрнеста Кочетова: Диалог: диалогистика как наука о судьбах человека и мира в контексте глобальных перемен: Научная монография / Обществ. ак. наук геоэкономики и глобалистики. – Москва: Экономика, 20С.

Научная монография подводит итог научным изысканиям автора о зарождении и развитии нового направления в сфере гуманитарного знания – диалогистики.

Впервые в мировой и отечественной научной литературе поднимается один из фундаментальных вопросов современности: роль и место диалога в судьбах человека и мира в эпоху глобальных трансформаций. Дается общий контур диалогистики как науке о базовых теоретических и методологических основах взаимного и согласованного миропонимания, о выходе на новые горизонты межцивилизационного диалога как фундаментального начала гармонизации нашего мира.

Особую важность автор придает необходимости выработки высоких гуманитарных технологий снятия напряженности и поддержания глобальной цивилизационной устойчивости, повышению роли диалога в мониторинге мирового проблемного «поля», выработке новых принципов принятия решений по глобальным проблемам современности.

Инновационный характер исследования определяется тем, что делается прорыв к новому знанию в общественных науках, раскрываются новые подходы к философии диалога, его движущие мотивационные «пружины», поле, сферы и участники, ставится проблема перевода нового знания о диалоге в научные институты, его оформление и научное закрепление.

Реальность и доказательность в постановках проблем и достоверность подходов к их разрешению через диалог базируется на том, что автор является непосредственным участником мировых форумов, международных конференций, семинаров, симпозиумов, круглых столов (Москва, С-Петербург, Екатеринбург, Ярославль, Родос, Прага, Модена, Тампере, Лахти, Канзас, Пекин, Шанхай, Штутгарт и др.), на пленарных и секционных заседаниях которых он выступает с докладами.

Книга адресована первопроходцам в сферу новейшего знания об окружающем нас мире, смело поднимающим вопросы высочайшего ранга, представителям научных, деловых, политических и общественных кругов, религиозных конфессий, структурам, формирующим ключевые «повестки дня» глобального диалога о судьбе мира, стратегию развития России, ее взаимодействие с «новым» миром.

Автор книги – Эрнест Георгиевич Кочетов, Президент Общественной академии наук геоэкономики и глобалистики, научный руководитель Геоэкономической группы при Государственной Думе Российской Федерации, заведующий Центром стратегических исследований геоэкономики ГУ-ВШЭ НИИВС, доктор экономических наук, академик РАЕН. известен как творец и разработчик нового знания о современном мире, создатель новых глобальных направлений в общественных науках: новых подходов к мировоззрению и миропониманию, к выработке механизмов и технологий для понимания людей; научной геоэкономической парадигмы, обоснованию программ действия для достижения безопасности.

Презентация книги «Диалог» прошла на XXIV Московской международной книжной выставке-ярмарке (с 7 по 12 сентября, 2011 г.):  http://kochetov. *****/wind. php? ID=642680&soch=1, а также на Родосском форуме «Диалог цивилизаций» (о. Родос, Греция, 6-10 октября 2011 г.) http://www. wpfdc. org/55-knigki/544-dialogistika-na-rodosskom-forume-2011-goda

Полный текст книги в электроном виде размещен в Интернете для ее свободного и бесплатного скачивания и использования в научных и учебных целях: 
http://kochetov. *****/wind. php? ID=641398&soch=1
http://*****/node/90

Аннотация

Эрнест Кочетов. Гуманитарный прорыв: диалог обретает научную форму – диалогистику

В статье представлен смысл, содержание и основные положения разработанной автором новой гуманитарной глобальной концепции мироустройства. Отличительной особенностью и уникальностью авторской концепции является то, что она базируется на геоэкономической научной парадигме мирового развития, одним из разработчиков которой является автор. Поднимается один из фундаментальных вопросов современности: роль и место диалога в судьбах человека и мира в эпоху глобальных мировых трансформаций. Диалог предстает как способ, адекватный коммуникативному взаимодействию народов и его институтов, цивилизаций, мировой системы и мирового сообщества. Это сопровождается фундаментальными научными открытиями, появлением новых сфер гуманитарного знания. На базе обобщения накопленного опыта делается прорыв к новому знанию в общественных науках – к диалогистике как научному обоснованию и закреплению новой когнитивной модели справедливого устроения миропорядка. Ставится проблема перевода нового знания о диалоге в научные институты, его оформления и научное закрепления.

Источник:

http://www. wpfdc. org/en/society/907-humanitarian-breakthrough-dialogue-assumes-a-scientific-form-of-dialogistics

11 Мая 2012 г.

Примечание:

«Меморандум! – Воззвание! – Набат!: Бакинское движение за мир и безопасность» опубликован 5 января 2013 г. в Интернете на «Информационно-аналитическом портале «VIРЕRSОN»: http://*****/wind. php? ID=657504&soch=1

Attachment 3

Ernest Kochetov[17]

Humanitarian breakthrough: dialogue assumes a scientific form of  Dialogistics

We are witnesses of real global processes: social codes of the humanity’s self-preservation manifest themselves arising from the depths of consciousness. This process is accompanied by fundamental scientific discoveries, emergence of new spheres of humanitarian knowledge. Dialogistics is among them as a scientific validation and fixation of a new cognitive model of a justified world order’s organization. Dialogue presents an adequate method of interaction between nations and their institutions, civilizations, the world system and the world community through communication.

1.  Basics of the dialogue’s problem definition –

singling out the main components and their contents

The world community having crossed the new millennial line of its history has strongly realized the responsibility for preservation of the unique world’s civilization, its colorful diversity of lifestyles, cultures, ethnical and national features, unique nature.

But how fragile our world is! The mankind has accumulated so many contradictions, misunderstandings, differences! So many mortal dangers, threats and challenges are hidden in such situation! And the idea of the “Dialogue between civilizations” and its Russian and foreign forums as the international intellectual platforms (forums in Moscow, Saint-Petersburg, Yekaterinburg, Yaroslavl, Sochi, Phodes, Beijing, Paris, Prague, Modena, Tampere, Lahti, etc.) was destined to be formed. In their creative atmosphere vitally-important, acute problems of the world are discussed.

Motive for a “large-scale conversation”. 2000. It was the year of a rare, millennial “turning-point”. A sudden border-line of closing the books, making assessments, a launching pad for the new millennium. The man has looked around and in horror observes the results of his own deeds. He looks to the right and sees his own firmly built “world system”: the technogenic world, circled into the continuously working deadly machine – the system of institutions. He looks to the left and sees the “world community” (aka the “world society”): as an ill conscience of the epoch, as a “voice in the wilderness”. He looks around and meets the look of “nature” deformed and depleted by him. He hides his eyes, looks at himself, at his inner “self” and flinches unconsciously from the cosmological abyss of his inner life.

Viewing all this, the man involuntarily turns to the “world system”, to the “world community”, to “nature” and, of course, to his own “self” and his “self” in those things. And he is surrounded by questions. He mounts them one on another trying to find any validation of the world, which he, himself, has built this way, and essentially, a self-justification. In other words, there is a continuous dialogue of the man with those, let’s call them, objects of the dialogue. At the same time they are playing the role of subjects in this world’s “conversation”. They ask difficult questions both to each other and together to the man: “Was that your aim? Is this the meaning of your existence? With this and for this you have come and are coming to “such” world?”

The leading directions of searching for the answers. In the course of trying to realize the projects of the global integration the “world community” has faced the problem of inconsistency of positions of the “world system”, the “environment” and the “man” in understanding the aims and the results of these projects. The focus is not on the man anymore. This is the central contradiction of the epoch; here the world is undergoing giant breaks. A grand world system is been formed, which is drawing the man into the whirl of events. Tension, uncertainty, fear for the future of the mankind are growing. Here runs the breach in views of the world and its destiny. Actual ratio of the world community, the world system and the man, the pragmatic content of this ratio with the aims of harmonious development of the world can be found only in the continuous practice of the dialogue between states, confessions, national and transnational public and economic structures and the man.

A unique breakthrough “Dialogue-action” of the people and the world community is needed here: to achieve radical improvement of life through joint intellectual effort aimed at rightful and honest relations between people, countries, various world structures and systems, along with radical! revision of the attitude towards “nature”.

Thereby new approaches to the philosophy of the dialogue, its moving motivating “powers”, high technologies of the dialogue are revealed - as a rise towards the most urgent scientific phenomenon – “Dialogistics”. Dialogistics in a new way highlights the intellectual rise – forms, ways, stages, mechanisms of work of the paradigm cluster “geoeconomics > global studies > humanitarian cosmologic”.

The value of pragmatism! Understanding of the value real actions and pragmatism has come. The world is tired of the “world” conversations for the sake of conversations, dialogue for the sake of dialogue: under their cover the world hypocrisy, injustice, open cynicism and violence blossom. And these are accompanied with endless disputes about good intentions, urges, resolutions, which are not binding, declarations, agreements. Absolute deafness between the opinions of the world community (society) and the world power structures. There are no bridges, no links between them.

The reality is that with good talks (world dialogues, which are not binding) the road to hell is paved: the “sword” and the “sheath” has not met, everybody reach to the nuclear buttons under the cover of sedative charms.

A “new dialogue” is on the agenda with its new nature, which is able to break the existing situation by translating the dialogue to the new “businesslike” language of communication.

Russia adopts such approach to the dialogue, putting to the front a bunch of the newest humanitarian projects, initiatives of the world level. Among those – realization of the high-class geoeconomical projects; they form the new logic of blurring various borders: borderlines, planes, spaces. International infrastructure projects play the role of high humanitarian technologies of decreasing tension; they unify the world on the basis of the balance and harmonization of geoeconomical interests. Here the geoeconomical dialogue opens new horizons and ways to the stable world, to the formation of a new class of world contracts.

A grand global problem is been posed of resolving the situations, through which the mankind goes from time to time. The reference is to the problem concerning the whole modern Universe, not just a part of it: its turning-point is coming. History tells us about such situations. These are the “renaissance” transformations of such rank and strength, which leave no element in the world, which has not been put through quality transformation.

Renaissance! Repairing the world will not help. Set of values, which are basic to it, motives, interests and aspirations, images, orienting points, aims, etc. – everything ends its natural lifecycle and goes into nonexistence. A huge tidal wave of energy of new meanings, new values, and new horizons of existence rises. Carriers of such global shifts are the new people. They can already be met on the world intellectual “planes”!

The New People – people with a calm view of things, capable of their intellectual “probing”, and thus, close to their essences; people who have not let themselves be fooled with ideological dogmas and other hallucinations, and thus rare even among the free people; people armed with a new, volumetric-network method of the world outlook, mature and prepared to organize and equip our world – the Universe of the new Renaissance, and thus to provide for existence, worthy of its strength, beauty, vitality and intellect.

Here the role of the dialogue is also paramount, but it is different: the dialogue with the new people, carriers of new high renaissance meanings, new realities, new pragmatics and experience – it has no place for a leisurely clarification of the parties’ positions, probing their “weak points”, stating differences, hidden threats, dangers and challenges.

Central “agenda” of the new global dialogue is being formed: “High humanitarian technologies of constructing a New Universe”, on the one hand, and “What should be done with the obsolete Universe?” – on the other, how to avoid its “repairing”, reviving dead paradigms, carrying out the man’s depreciation, death and destruction, how not to find ourselves under the ruins of the obsolete “modern” world.

2. Field of the Problem (general outline: the world panoramic view)

The world is undergoing an intellectual rise, (and Russia is setting its own tone and pace). The rise is following its own paths, has its own forms, stages and intellectual platforms, where the attention is focused on intense exchange of opinions at meetings dedicated to urgent problems of the world. They are many – various in topics, level and list of participants. To feel the atmosphere, dominating at these meetings of people – both acquainted with each other and strangers – one should visit such meeting. What do people talk about? What makes them bring up the questions of such rank, that even their shadow makes people tremble and hearts beating in unison? What is hidden behind the “agendas” of such meetings and which contexts of speeches tell more than the speeches themselves and the more so, than their publications?

The answer is clear – the problems have aroused! New problems! Grand problems!

There is nothing incidental here! The man and the world community have matured. They have grown serious, looked around and have seen what they did not want to see – the world has become a dangerous place.

A realization has come – the mankind is walking on the minefield – “the modern world “field” of problems”! The dialogue has lit this uncharted field, has brought us to its edge, and we have stepped on it! What are we dealing with? A metaphor will help us. Imagine that you see a giant field, all of it mined with antipersonnel and antitank mines, and to make it “easier” to trip mines, they are assisted with invisible meshes. It is dangerous to walk on such field for an ignorant man, and those who are aware of the situation, those who have been stuck there “accidentally”, as well as the witnesses, are trying to demine the place, searching for meshes. The same situation is with problems in our world: “problems – mines” are laid by one, their impossible burden (the mines are tripped!) is carried by other and the third in special (“difficult”) cases gather at special sites (these are the sites of the highest intellectual rank: world forums, congresses, conferences, conventions, symposia, etc.) and try to find a solution of this problem (i. e. to “demine” the place).

The danger has reached the most precious – life, its foundations, meaning, stimuli and motivations, its value origins! We have to meet together to speak about it: about the problems, about the questions of small and large scale, to speak directly, freely, honestly, looking into the eyes of the partners in conversation. To discuss those issues an urgent need in the new “agenda” aroused and in formation of new structures, which appeared straight away. The sites for conversations match – they are the platforms of high intellectual rank. They are already numerous on our planet. They became practical realization of a historical “burst” and along with this – center points of the “Large-scale dialogue” and the newest international intellectual sites on the world’s problem field of the dialogue. A special example is Rhodes [18]!

Why Rhodes?

Rhodes is a crossroad of the world’s passions, dormant civilizations, and a symbol of silent example. Shadows of the past lurk here, the witnesses of missed opportunities, where civilizations fell and new ones rose. Here, the most vital epoch of Hellenism transformed into the dark Middle Ages. Here the nature itself speaks about different values, on the origins of harmony, beauty, understanding and peace. One, who even once visited Rhodes, its atmosphere of epochs’ dialogue, will not be able to return to his present state – a conceptual picture (panorama) of the world is opening to him, seeing which stirs up the man’s conscience. Rhodes has already become not only a place of annual meetings, but a symbol of hope, belief into ideals of agreement, peace, understanding and harmony, an intellectual platform, where a high humanitarian though opens fully.

Rhodes gives us the brightest example of a modern dialogue, a representative and a really existing “higher case” of it. A new style of the dialogue and its new rank is formed here, a starting platform, a kind of a “launch pad” for future large-scale generalizations and entering the beginning of a new stage of the dialogue, and, through the dialogue – the new sphere of the world outlook and its scientific formalization – “Dialogistics”.

This is first of all for the account of the public structures that the interest to the world problems of the new rank arose. The world’s civil society is faced with a challenge, which it has accepted and answered! High-class structures of the global dialogue have risen! Among them ongoing platforms: the World public forum “Dialogue of civilizations”, the Economic Forum “Dialogue West-East: integration and development”, the International congress of industrialists and entrepreneurs, the Forum “Petersburg’s dialogue”, the International conference “Modern state and the global security” in Yaroslavl (September, 2009), the International investment forums “Sochi-2009”, “Sochi-2010”, the World political forum in Yaroslavl (September, 2010), the Baykal economic forum and dozens of other forums, international conferences, symposia, round tables.

Highly intellectual, informative “agendas” of forums, conferences, symposia not only bring them the priority and the international reputation, but form a network of first-rate centers of intellectual thought, which recommendations are listened to by the world leaders and the world institutions.

The practice of a dialogue and formed experience of the active dialogistical structures give perfect material for generalizations, which open a way to new horizons of theory and practice of a dialogue, its role in the most recent global, regional and national problems.

The life is not static! Everything is changing like in a giant kaleidoscope. New urgent concerns arise, new people, new timings of taking decisions. This inevitably brings new forms of the world agreements and new technologies of the dialogue. A necessity of the dialogue to acquire its fundamental scientific form is in the air.

It is time to view with a general theoretical and methodological look the conditions of the dialogue’s new forms appearance, on the one hand, and on the other – it is of no less importance to show a philosophical view of the dialogue’s problem, accompanying those innovations: “Dialogistics” enters the world scientific arena:

Dialogistics – is a new branch of humanitarian knowledge, a science of basic theoretical and methodological foundations of the mutual and coordinated world outlook in the conditions of global transformations, of entering new horizons of the intercivilizational dialogue as a fundamental source of the world’s harmonization. Of high humanitarian technologies to relieve tensions and maintaining the global civilizational stability, theoretical basics of monitoring the civilizational stability and new principles of taking decisions on the global problems of the modern world.

The dialogue started on Rhodes, and from Rhodes philosophical origins of the dialogue we are laying a way to the global world outlook picture.

Many things have linked here! There are self-supporting elements here!!

The beginning of the third millennium – the dialogue started! It existed already in the past – everything that is constructed in the world up till now – is the dialogue’s result, as a sum of large and small palliatives and compromises interweaved into the tissue of formal and informal agreements and conventions, rules of conduct, etc. But the XXI century has revealed many things.

First. Having looked back to the way behind the mankind has realized that all existing agreements are not “worth the candles”. They are broken when, by whom and where needed! A doubt rises if a dialogue is a “cover” to probe the partners’ condition, to find some guarantee, some self-justifying logic and ground for brave shifts in behavior in favor of one or another player on the dialogue’s field.

An “iron clad” rule has been revealed – do “something” and then invite a “word” – the “world society” for an endless dialogue and negotiations to search for a consensus (i. e. to put up with the accomplished fact!) and tiny, mostly verbal, concessions to the “looser” party.

Second. Fundamental understanding of viciousness of such existing models and technologies of the dialogue has come. The choice is extremely tough: either the mankind continues these games, or a principally new stage of the dialogue replaces it, which severely bares the real situational global picture of the world, baring the fundamental, real “subjects” and “objects” of the dialogistical community, baring their aims, hidden ambitions, tasks and mechanisms of their resolution.

Third. The most important thing in the dialogue now is its principally new, qualitative shift. This concerns, first of all, clear definition and singling out the central, main participants of the world dialogue. Who are they?

First of all, they are four players: the “Man”, the “World System”, the “World society” and the “Nature”. They enter the dialogical field with a new agenda. A new stage of ascension to a scientific phenomenon – dialogistic – begins.

Fourth. Dialogistics operate a different set of issues judging from both their scale and importance. There is no place left for leisurely pondering, deadly deafness of dangers, threats and challenges for the mankind and the people. The problems here are posed more deeply and seriously – questions of both the centennial and millennial rank, baring the open wounds of the very essence of the man beaten with the silent social contract, the questions are leaned onto the giant technogenic chariot – the “world system” having chained to itself with a myriad of invisibles strings both the “man” and the “world community” in general, which chariot exhaust them in its amok race.

Fifth. At last the understanding of the total viciousness of the philosophical objectification of our world has come, attributing to the words (notions, categories), sounds and gestures of some “entity”, a myth on the would-be objective laws of social development. Nothing of the kind! It is all the man’s doing! Deformation of our world and its unsettled state reflect the deformation of the man’s consciousness. (These are those “ruins in minds” that M. Bulgakov genially wrote about). But we take this thesis to the giant time and space line – the millennial one.

Thus, at the turning point of the centuries and millennia we bravely entered the “problem field of the dialogue” – it has appeared its’ most important parameter (characteristic) – and started to carry out a leisurely dialogue about the destinies of the mankind and the world in the context of the global changes.

The dialogue’s problem field – a) a characteristic (parameter) of the dialogue; b) conventional panorama of the world’s problems and its descriptive image; c) a set of questions of different ranks, being part of agendas of international, regional and national forums, conferences, symposia, round tables, etc.; d) the system, where the “agendas” with current and prospective questions are raised, local and global in their scale, urgent and stored for the future and waiting to be solved, including the “dormant” problems of the millennial rank; e) dialogistical map of intellectual platforms, both continuously operating and spontaneous, whereto the problems of different ranks are brought, where they are discussed and the solutions are being searched for.

3. Parties and Participats (a cluster “Man – World community – World system” comes to the problem field of the dialogue)

We are cautious! “The dialogue’s problem field” is a “mine field”! We are carefully looking around here.

Here it is not enough to outline the contour of the modern problem field, although having saturated it with the general philosophical display as a living boiling system, where the “agendas” with current and prospective questions are raised, local and global in their scale, urgent and stored for the future and waiting to be solved, including the “dormant” problems of the millennial rank.

Here we should pay special attention to the following important parameter (characteristic) of the dialogue, namely, - its “participants” (sometimes this term is substituted with the notion of “parties”).

Let us say from the beginning that our task does not include a meticulous listing and description of all the dialogue’s “characters”, playing the roles of “parties” and “participants”. Let us concentrate on just three of them: 1) the Man, 2) the World society and 3) the World system. Their choice is of methodological character and forms their imaginative perception. On the problem field they play the role of conventional subjects and objects of the dialogue.

Before “expressively” specifying and singling out the central figurants of the global dialogue, playing the roles of its subjects and objects, we should stop on the nature of these notions, the origins of their philosophical background. On this matter we have high-quality philosophical and scientific literature, which we will surely use not to rediscover America. We are interested in finding out specific characteristics of those plays, where each participant of our trinity, - the Man, the World society and the World system, plays the role of a subject in one case, and an object – in the other.

Here objectification of our world took its toll: it leads to singling out of collective images - the Man, the World society and the World system – brings them to the level of subjects and objects, with the transformation of one into another with the total transformation of the form and function.

Along with this their functions are opening in the mutual interaction: in other words, a cluster “Man – World community – World system” comes to the global “Large-scale” dialogue on the destinies of the man and the world.

Doubtless, the central place in this triad is given to the “Man” and it’s explained further why it is so.

On the one hand, the man is the weakest “link” of the modern Universe. Generally, he has burned the bridges of “returning to himself”. “Trimmed” with ideological dogmas, he is inbuilt into the “world” system and, having acquired the specialty (or the smallest skill!) he serves an inseparable link in the giant machine (the world system) during his life, which slowly, but inevitably consumes (utilizes) him.

But, on the other hand, there is no subject in the world, which is higher and more self-sufficient than the “man”, due to the fact that he has intelligence. A moment comes, when the man understands all the absurdity and invalidity of his “inbuilt” state into the world system – machine. And the main thing in this is the understanding of the fact, that it’s the result of his own actions!! And at last the new people appeared who have broken away from the imprisonment of this machine. The “New people” issue the invoice to the “existing” Universe, having singled out its critical, weakened and obsolete elements. The man bravely and in full voice announces this at the world intellectual platforms.

Thus, the man is not a passive observer of his destiny and the destiny of the surrounding world. The most powerful weapon in the man’s hands is the “question” itself! Having broken away from the imprisonment of the world enslaving system, the man has not left it behind, - he has leaned a giant question onto it, the scale and the weight of which are comparable with the millennial load, which was experienced by the man “inbuilt” into the World system. And the Universe, together with the Man inbuilt into it, the World society and the World system has reeled, it is doomed, it will fall under the weight of this question. But the man is asking questions not only to the World system, questions to the World community have accumulated as well. A huge suspicion rose: “What if the world community is the apologist of the world system?” At the same time, the man puts enormous hopes to the healthy beginning in the world community, its life-asserting core.

The world society, playing on the problem field the crossover role of “subjects” and “objects” of the dialogue, can’t help demonstrating its nature, coming out from the idea of “community”, but, along with that, in the transformed kind of this idea, dictated by the roles of “subject” and “object”. In this sense, it has its own specifics, reflecting in its structure, its aims, tasks and interests. The form of representation of the “world society” on the world’s dialogue intellectual platforms is characterized with special extravagance.