Набат (стр. 5 )

Thus, the world community on the arena of the dialogue clearly demonstrates its duality. Entering the tissue of the world system, the world community carries the “color” of its apologetics. Its duality is reflected as well in the roles, the world community plays either as the subject or the object of the dialogue. That results in a considerable dispersion of in structure, aims and tasks of the world community. This results as well in the character of its representation at the world’s dialogue intellectual platforms. But the central element of this duality is relationships between the world community and the world system. At the current stage of the world’s development the tone is set by the world system. And it will be further explained why.

When we speak about the “modernity”, our understanding of it corresponds in our minds first of all with the notion “world system”, which forms the image of the modern lifestyle. Here come the “institutes” inbuilt into the knots of the “crystalline grid”, titled the “world system”. Here come the interactions between those institutes and the “environment” where the crystalline grid put into. Now this environment is determined by the notion of “technogenity”, which gives certain “color” to the whole modern Universe.

Thus, the “world system” on the problem field of the dialogue due to the qualities inherent to it, and, first of all, to the determinacy, demonstrates a strict position in posing problem questions of existence: the world system is not an enemy to itself, it has a giant potential to protect itself both on the part of the “man” inbuilt in it, and on the part of the “world community” – the parts included (signed-in) into the world system as their own apologists.

And so, the world has assigned a cluster of “Man - World community – World system” for the global dialogue – the central “players” of the global problem field. We should note a special characteristic of this “triad”. Each of them has in themselves other participants in this triad in some proportion. This is a kind of “cross-over” mirror. Thus, the man looks into himself and sees in his image powerful echoes of the world system’s apologist. Here the man himself protects and justifies his “imprisonment” in the frame of the world system, and at the same time, takes the role of the messenger on the part of the world community, proving the unchangeable state of peace in “such” a “well-balanced” triad as “Man - World community – World system”. The same situation is both in the world system and in the world society. In other words, inbuilt into each participant apologetic component shows itself clearly at the dialogue’s platforms, it is seen with the naked eye, and it changes considerably depending on the role, which the participant of the dialogue plays – the subject or the object.

Besides the abovementioned duality of the structural tissue of the dialogue’s participants, fundamental limitedness is clearly seen, certain limit in setting questions and “agendas” of the dialogue – as if there is a kind of closed shell, where the “problems” of the modern world are boiling, in its strictly set format, closeness of the world “conversation” in this shell. Naturally one more problem arises here in this connection: what encumbers going out of this shell and breaking it? The answer is clear – there are so-called “prohibition parameters” (under G. G. Malinetsky), violating which change not only the quality, technology, etc., but the very essence of the dialogue.

Having specified the central characteristics (parameters) of the dialogue – the “problem field”, “the parties and participants”, which are opening a certain picture of the dialogue a bit, more technological, than conceptual, we, naturally, have advanced in our research to the next most important characteristic of the dialogue – finding out the meaning of the dialogue itself! And moreover we are interested in why the questions connected with such categories as meanings, values, motivations and stimuli of our existence, to a large extent more philosophical, than scientific, come to the center of the dialogue’s attention, asking to come into the “agenda”? Could it be that meanings, values, motivations and stimuli in our world have already become a problem? To which extent these categories correspond to the realistic and pragmatic part of the world issues, which problems have occupied the platforms of the dialogue at all levels: national, regional, global? We should pay special attention to clarify those issues!

4. The world discourse (meanings, values, motivations, stimuli – social self-preservation “codes” went into action in the world)

As a rule the most dangerous things in the world are ignored! It is being avoided, not bringing nearer and not pushing away, just hoping that the problems will disappear by themselves, that new problems will come, more dangerous ones and will take them over. It is a mind’s misbelieve! In the same way a conversation about simple truths, meanings, values, motivations and stimuli is avoided. But the simple truths are the most explosive ones! They hide the social “self-preservation codes” and sooner or later they will show themselves!

Discourse on the meanings is ancient as the world itself. And the history of the mankind is the history of justifying different meanings in different ways: starting from uncompromising philosophical disputes to riots, revolutions and bloody world wars. Everybody having grabbed the “cloth” of meanings pools it his way from the world table.

Our time! The beginning of the third millennium! The “old” meanings have received an irreparable blow. Social codes of self-preservation have awakened. Slogans (dangerous slogans!) of simple truths have risen from the depths of consciousness. This stirs up the apologists of the world triad “Man – World community – World system”, a giant conceptual question has raised before them: “Disassembly of the technogenic world?”

To seize the problem and to so bravely and uncompromisingly pose a question is the most unique chance of the millennial history! It is accompanied with the conversation about the meanings of our world – “simple” truths are raised to the pedestal! Among them – “The Man wants to live!”, “The Man is free!”, “The beauty will save the world! (F. Dostoevsky)”! However “worn-out” and banal are these slogans for the apologists of the obsolete Universe (“yesterday” world!), they break into the dialogue’s agenda in various interpretations. New people hold these agendas in their hands suggesting the opponents to speak about the “technologies” of disassembling the “sagged” Universe and entering the way to the new one. But for this it is necessary to acknowledge new values.

Category of value in the world discourse is remarkable by itself: the values are being juggled with as the meanings are messed, but even with more calculation, filigree, using various tools, the most sophisticated and less so! Here the apologists of the yesterday world are “working” on the man’s consciousness, “scalding” it with hallucinations, ideologies, illusions, myths, by this bandaging, substituting the value of small, close, visible, daily with all possible “rainbows”, in other words, knocking out the support of common sense and healthy origin from the man.

In this connection on the high intellectual platforms there are topics for discussion, there are questions, painful and urgent ones!!

Value segment of the world dialogue allows to dig out (through the layer of values, deforming the man’s consciousness and exhausting his life) the common sense, the values of small horizons, the daily values of life and along with them – to outline the problems of motivations and stimuli in the agendas of the world discourse.

Never before the man has sensed so urgently and painfully the motivations and stimuli, which day by day raise him from the bed in the morning, wind him up and equip for the daily trip. What drives him? Urge to work? Search for “daily bread” and wealth? Aspiration for creativity? For fight and competition? What are the motivations for “community”, “unification”, “security and sense of support”? What are the motivations and stimuli in different economic systems, and more so, in giant civilizational models?

The man in general has a giant scope of wants and aspirations. He can set endless aims. They are accompanied with the same scope of stimuli and motivations driving the man to reach all those aims and wants. Here lies the contradiction and the discrepancy: the man is left with the narrowest passageway of really achievable aims and wants – and the life leaves him with the correspondingly narrow path of stimuli and motivations, accompanying those aims.

From whichever side the man approaches the problem of meanings; he inevitably has frightful in their simplicity and extreme bareness thoughts: “I have come to this world for life! I have come to this world being free! With this, I grace this beautiful planet, this is my credo, dignity, my first and last words! And if somebody – the world community or the world system – thinks differently, so worse for them! Let them keep this opinion to themselves – it does not concern me! Otherwise I am able to… eliminate them! This world is my own hands’ deed – and only mine!”

If to compress extremely the subject of discourse about stimuli and motivations, than, the bottom line would be the following:

1.  Stimuli and motivations of the first rank show themselves through careful redistribution of benefits: they are given out in doses minimally necessary to provide functioning of the triad “Man – World community – World system”. This minimal volume determines the rank, the limit and content of stimuli and motivations of the first rank. These are stimuli and motivations of survival – i. e. – to be able to get to this minimum! Through the system of stimuli and motivations this minimal volume of benefits is reached in hard fight.

2.  Stimuli and motivations of the second rank provide access to the practically unlimited volume of benefits, which are spent for:

-  changing the areas of influence;

-  fighting for access to resources.

This fight is accompanied with:

-militarization of the consciousness,

- creation and maintenance of giant military machines and repressive apparatus;

- growing and maintenance of enormous armies of philosophizing apologists of the set system (politologists, cultural experts, ideologists). The idea of praising labor works for this, as well as the unrestrained mania of development and the sense of support (comradeship) in the common action and the re-interpreted sense of national and patriotic, and various international economic systems and, eventually, - civilizational models in general.

3.  –Ultimately stimuli and motivations of both ranks assist total exhaustion of the man, the world community and the world system. They do not give grounds for motivations for “life!”, but only for “survival!” – to survive at all costs in this giant technogenic chariot and in continuous fight with it!

Understanding the questions of stimuli, motivations and values, clarifying in the global discourse their nature and their involvement in our modern deformed Universe, logically raises thoughts: are there already some approaches existing to other senses, other values and motivations, and are there in reality their new outlines existing already? Do we unconsciously have already some experiences and practices, where we can with our own eyes view the aborning new world, - at the moment only as a “draft of the new Universe”, coming from the depths of the man’s consciousness.

Having sensed the problem of the world discourse, connected with meanings, values, motivations and stimuli, we, thereby, receive the prolongation of the new subject, and namely of new experiences, new practices, to rising to and entering new spheres and horizons, to the “Large global projects” – to the new Renaissance, dawning above our planet like a new Universe. We will tell the reader about the dialogue already developing in the world on this subject, in the chapter “Experiences”.

5. Experiences (first passes of the “new” in the “old” Universe – rise, new spheres, new horizons)

Practical nature of our dialogues is doubtless! Here we can even observe its own rhythm, route and tone: with a hidden hope the mankind is gathering at its intellectual platforms, summing up the results, shares the achieved and outlines new ways and stages of achieving the targets. But there is a kind of seal on it: the conversation as a kind of started mechanism, the mechanism, which is well-known, the parts of which are recognized in the light of the problem and are a priory determined by the existing practice. Each running of such mechanism-machine is defined as a kind of incident and some kind of experience. This experience is stored away before the next incident takes place, which becomes an experience and is stored away as well… etc. But recently on the problem field of the dialogue newest questions arose, “different”, “other” in their height and their urgency and force. Their difference, irregularity is apparent. There is no large accumulated experience here as yet, they are beyond the frameworks of conventional, and the set mechanism of discourse is little adapted to new questions. A new mechanism of dialogue is being formed beside it. It takes these new questions for processing and inputs new experiences and new practices into history. And it starts working on this with conceptualization of fundamental origins of the new, with the “large-scale” dialogue, with the renaissance rise, entering new spheres and new horizons, clarifying the units, laid into the foundation of the new Renaissance Universe.

The Mankind is held captive by the misbelieve that old, obsolete systems of existence fall into oblivion by themselves, melt away, freeing humanitarian space for the new, under formation. It is not so! At the last, finalizing stage of the lifecycle the old system, as a flash of obsolete, mobilizes the remains of its energy to fight the new and thereby leaves a bloody trace in the history.

The Mankind learned to force open the road to the new through the layers of past, which is often as strong as a granite wall. But there is a way here – like breaking huge tunnels in the rocks – there are its own approaches, mechanisms and skills: humanitarian “tunneling shield” is cutting into the fossilized layers of traditional, fixed, packed during centuries. New fundamental intentions and plans are constructing their own “tunneling machine” and its impact “working” parts are like a rammer on the obsolete. Conceptualization plays the role of the latter. In our case it is the conceptualization of the global theory of the dialogue between civilizations, public systems, people as a new logic of meanings. And behind it the outline of the future tunnel can be seen: forms, routes, stages of the renaissance rise.

The man is not moving blindly in the darkness of times: he is led by the steel logic, lighting the way, forming the stages of moving to the new scientific knowledge about the world, and to the “Large-scale projects”, built on its base. Along with this, the course of the projects’ realization is compared (benchmarked) against the best examples of renaissance paradigm shifts taking place in the past. But that’s not all; we already have “our” own experience of the world transformations – the first experience of humanitarian tunneling operations! Having outlined with the clearly seen dotted line the trajectories of movement to the Universe of the new Renaissance, the mankind rushes to new spheres and horizons.

But having stepped on the uncharted roads of the dialogue about the destinies of the mankind and the world during the epoch of global changes, the “Man” bravely fights with a new danger: the obsolete world wants revenge. And here there is a task of giant importance – to extinguish this fight through the dialogue at the international intellectual platforms of the highest rank.

Here in fine feather the nature of the dialogue shows itself – the dialogue is the generally recognized form of relieving tension. This is achieved for the account of forming the newest agendas. Among them the most urgent is the one with questions: what is the man’s rush into new spheres and new horizons and to what extent the logic of the dialogue changes in the new conceptual problem definition? Which units are foundational in fundamental definition of the global problems of our world?

The answer on these questions is near (and there is no need to look for the obvious here!) – the stages (“elements” of some kind of tunnel) have been clearly defined on the uncharted ways of the dialogue to the new, unusual: “geoeconomics – global studies – humanitarian cosmology”. Each element is already tested in the world conceptual practice – they are given the clear theoretical and methodological form. At numberless forums, conferences, symposia, the ways of their further movement are being clarified. Along with this remarkable links between those elements and healthy elements and mechanisms of functioning of both the world community and the world system are bared. The geoeconomics is characteristic in this way.

The geoeconomics has entered the world discourse so powerfully, unexpectedly and well-prepared! The attack on the semi-feudal, Old-Westphalian economic system went on powerfully, uncompromisingly and simultaneously from the three sides – three geoeconomical schools: American, Russian and Italian. Which energy has moved the geoeconomical paradigm to the frontline? Why the geoeconomics has “emerged” at the right moment and in the right time?

The answer is found: the general interest in the geoeconomic plane – the basis of new agreements – the mankind has apprised the leadership of economic in its life, economization of politics has become the symbol of time! Who understands it – that survives! The history teaches: who (being a person, structure, country, integration group, empire or civilization), does not want, or cannot, is unable to provide economically for himself (and in the modern epoch – geoeconomically), that is destined to be defeated. And it is not the “economic-centric” theory: the question is extremely demanding: either the world enters the exhausting geopolitical fight of “each with everybody”, or manage to enter the geoeconomical horizons of development, to use enormous possibilities of the “peaceful!” international economic interaction of people at the international economic arena.

The general geoeconomic paradigm of the world development, the comprehension of which the mankind started at the end of the bygone XX century, was very much demanded during the post-crisis period. It presented a key to the new model of the world economic communication, opened a new world economic landscape and started the formation of a new economic order. Here new players are bravely forming areas and points of the world growth on the geoeconomic atlas of the world. And at the world intellectual platforms goeoconomical motivations are resounding powerfully for the new economic world order – a breakthrough to the world income of the participants of the world economic system on the basis of the balance of geoeconomical interests.

But it is quite possible under the condition of comprehension of a new phase in the world development – all encompassing globalization, - as well as clarifying its principles through the newest branch of humanitarian knowledge – the global studies.

The science of global studies was formed on the basis of the geoeconomics and having secured itself at the geoeconomical positions it went on powerfully. It has subjected to its influence the intellectual platforms of the dialogue. Here the globalization itself is not the problem anymore! Discourse is about the main problems, accompanying the processes of globalization: about the breaks in the global community, on the destinies of the technogenic world, on the ratio of the global and local, on formation of new global institutions, etc. The world intellectual platforms of the dialogue have literally seized those problems: new interpretation of the global changes is taking place.

The world has provided its intellectual platforms of the dialogue for the new interpretation of the global changes – global transformation. Moreover, for the first time the sacramental question on the role and place of civilizational models in the course of the mankind’s evolution was posed, and further – the question of the category of “civilization” itself. It is not the time for leisurely pondering anymore: “on the one hand…, but on the other hand…”. The question is extremely demanding – will the civilizational fights take our world to the non-existence, how long the man will look from the depths of his consciousness at the situation formed by himself: “the enclave-separated world” without links and bridges between the civilizational areas? What to do in such situation, what is the acceptable resolution of this situation? The man finds answers to those questions in the humanitarian cosmology.

Humanitarian cosmology brings the new beginning in the world perception. Being the crown of global studies, it takes step by step inventory of the humanitarian cosmos of the mankind, and, thereby paves a road to the Universe of the new renaissance. It praises to high heaven and brings to the highest pedestal the man himself and his life-asserting origins, for the first time having proclaimed the “Doctrine of the Man” as the “Humanitarian manifest” of the XXI century. Humanitarian cosmology and the dialogue in their connection bring the man and his life-asserting origins to the highest value pedestal. And it is further used by the newest branch of the scientific knowledge – “Dialogistics” as a conceptualization of the global theory of the dialogue between civilizations, public systems, people, as the new logic of meanings.

All this tells that the mankind is not sitting on its hands! It is actually accumulating experience on posing questions of the high rank. Having sensed the renaissance rise and having already not just speculatively formed it and assigning routes and stages in the everyday practice – powerful theoretic, methodological and praxiological fundamental units of the new Renaissance are formed. These are the geosciences (among them: geoeconomics, global studies, geofinances, geologistics, geoinformatics), humanitarian cosmology, cognitive science and cognitive geography, etc. And now the newest scientific knowledge – “Dialogistics” is included into the man’s weaponry – the global theory and methodology of the dialogue between civilizations, public systems, people as the new logic of meanings.

Thereby the new “agenda” of the global dialogue is formed – the mankind should carefully monitor the old world’s habits, the obsolete world, the most dangerous world. Middle Ages disguised as modernity once again are trying to take over the planet, flood our consciousness. The Man and the world are bandaged with the social contract. Monotonous work is carried out on the man’s consciousness: ideologists of all kinds do not allow the man to wake up, deepening his lethargic state and, thereby, twisting his consciousness, keeping him in the state corresponding to the passing world, to the world of “yesterday”.

But the bell has already rung! Once I have passed by the Universe and noticed a warning on its front face: “Attention! Under demolition! Could be dangerous! There is a dead-end ahead! Use a bypass road! Keep to the right! And under the arrow: “A road to the Universe of the New Renaissance!” I was worried and hurried along: “What if somebody does not know yet about the warning and has not noticed it and could be hurt by accident?”

And I have warned whom I could with this book: “Warning! Warning! Fight with the “modern” Middle Ages and exit to the Universe of the new Renaissance!! New ways, new horizons! Ahead! Let’s go!”

A new “agenda” enters the problem field of the dialogue.

6. Notice № 1 (notification of the present and the forthcoming)

First lessons learned from the initial practice of laying routes into the unknown future already show what incredible stresses will have to be overcome in the daily contacts with the “modernity”. Behind the bright veil of this concept hides “new Middle Ages”, which has its own secret unspoken verdict – “The Social Contract”. The origins of this situation hide themselves in the “errors” of consciousness: in carefully fostered, finely grounded, strictly protected delusions of reason and strabismus of the world outlook. The science (“great” science, fundamental!) sets out for a campaign towards the fight against “modern” Middle Ages”, it takes along a portable scientific “surgical” tool for removing delusions and correcting strabismus of the world outlook. And not only this – there is also a proclamation of “ethics of the new”, mobilization for searching the origins of new knowledge genesis and paths for reaching new paradigmatic revolutions, incentives for making the first steps towards the Universe of the new Renaissance emerging from the fog of the future.

Somehow it turned out that in the huge flow of descriptions of our world, in thorough studies of its characteristics, features, etc. its medieval colouring was lost (deliberately or not?): there are few who notice danger in these new underpaintings on the canvas of modernity, much less think about the origins of their appearance. Global discourse breaks this situation, generates a great number of issues of high rank, and leans them against the modern Universe.

The situation changes, so do the issues: with the increase of the scale of events the calibre of issues is also growing! The new world is a globalizing world. The new world is a changing world. Across these historic moments of intellectual thought one will have to make a serious analysis of many topics, problem turnabouts. Intellectual thought gradually awakes from lethargic sleep; it will have to realize non-conventional issues for understanding the modern world panorama, necessary and highly topical - issues of higher rank.

But the scale of issues does not correspond to the required one yet! A very rare case: a person has lived through a thousand-year historical turning point. He is trying to look beyond this boundary of universe, with caution and great curiosity to predict conceptual signs of his existence. However – a paradox! He hasn’t made use of the rarest moment, not a single issue of millennial rank (the issue of a higher rank) has been raised. Alas, all today’s issues are confined to a hundred-year strategic conjuncture.

Only being at the turn of epochs, at this high point of observation it is fair enough to raise the issues of a higher rank.

• Primary issues — What does this chariot of modern civilization, made by a man, represent? How long can the mankind stand the pace and rhythm of its relentless run?

• Primordial problem: everyone comes into this hard world, which is prepared for them already, in the construction of which they did not participate, and by some quirk of fate this world is meant not only to be protected, maintained, but to be developed as well. Who ordained this destiny for the man? And is he free to depart from this mission? To understand the maze of such statement of question, shouldn’t these parties be separated in order to take a closer look at each of them, in order to make a decisive conclusion afterwards about the degree of compatibility of the parties (the man and the technogenic world) and then ask the key question — what should be done with both parties?

• At what point did the mankind miss the intersection till which secular (scientific) and religious consciousness had derived its inspiring forces from a single source — the nature, creating on this basis its solid and essentially vital worlds? After passing the fork, fanaticism from both sides started gaining its strength — each tries to bring the man on their side, injecting the world with giant contradictions; everybody started speaking about inter-civilization contradictions.

When the problem is reviewed from the point of mentioned positions, a number of issues of global importance also come into view of an observer. They will be arranged into groups!

The first block of problem issues. What unprecedented qualities did globalization bestow on the modern compact world, having woven it from previously odd aggregated systems and subsystems? And what about today’s final stage of internationalization and economic transnationalization? Wasn’t there born the newest population of the world system, which is not subject to traditional measurement? How did the laws of development transform, which previously served the disjoined system, and separate centres and structures, which are not soldered together? And is there a need for new optics for cluing and clarifying occurred global changes?

The second block of issues. What are the coordinates of modern development? And what if previously clarified (and, therefore, conventional) global paradigm, categories and entity models, having evolved, will exhaust their resources and disappear from historic stage? And is there the newest core of civilization paradigm being born in their depths, which will predetermine new key points of the world development in the XXI century?

The third block of issues. Is there a certainty that the change of development coordinates will not result in appearance of a new starting point in history, namely, a philosophical explanation, which is based on space-and-civilization existence, with various flows intertwining in all its spheres? Can we be the witnesses of the origin of a fundamentally new chronometer of development, a new starting point in time? At this point external time becomes “fossilized”, i. e., the development itself, giving space for internal time, and thereby separating life cycles of the man from technogenic global amplitudes.

And finally, the fourth block of issues. The world is a community shining with all colours of diversity. What is hidden behind this duality? What secret is kept by the human social nature in its mysterious depth? Will the man be able to read this riddle? What are the origins of these global processes? What is the fate of the established formations, in particular, of national states and their economies, regional communities and territorial enclaves, alliances, unions, etc., in this changing global world? What is in store for the banking system, credit market, system of international finance law, etc.?

And what is the fate of the established categories (concepts)? Moreover, is there a certainty that humanitarian paradigm itself didn’t stagger, having felt weakened categories? After all, fundamental (basic) concepts acquire new quality colouring. Among them there are economical concepts — money and its functions, equivalent and its transformation, world income and conditions of its formation and redistribution, world market, etc. Are we operating other categories — social categories, from which only shell has remained, while their actual content has been diluted? The same applies to a number of concepts in the sphere of political science, strategy, law, etc. Equally topical and important are the issues of elaborating the newest class of techniques for operating under conditions of the origin of global cross-border flows. This refers to the elaboration of such high geoeconomic technologies that will not only allow keeping the stable functioning of the subjects of world economic communication (supranational cross-border subjects, national economies and their business structures), but will also allow deriving strategic effect and world income from these flows.

One more aspect, coming in our view: how will globalized regions (economic, financial, legal, informational, etc.) behave under conditions of maturing and appearing on the historic foreground of a new civilization paradigm, replacing the exhausting technogenic phase of post-industrialism?

Groups of questions, meant to debunk dark era of the Middle Ages approaching the world, swarm, first of all, around the fundamental categories acting as pillars of our Universe. And there is a good reason for that. This is the very place where distortions, required by reason to fight against the “modern” Middle Ages, are hidden. Among such distortions there is “The Social Contract”.

7. Notice № 2 (paradigmatic revolution is at the gate of the future)

The world cherishes its enormous historical experience fixed in extant numerous regulations and agreements of various status. But this huge “archive” is also a quiet place for “unspoken!” documents-apologists of struggle with the man. These documents are inherently a verdict of “deep and all-round justification" of legality and competence for enslaving the man, making him a prisoner. And a special, “honourable” place belongs to “The Social Contract”, with its own structure, protocol and instructions on how to “bandage” the Man.

Debunking the enslaving “Social Contract”, which drove the man into imprisonment, is the first essential but not sufficient aspect in the battle against modern Middle Ages. It is equally important to reveal the sources, from which the social contract constantly draws its energy adding new pages to it and rewriting the old ones. One of the sources has been revealed already: in the depths of millennia consciousness did not avoid fatal errors.

The errors of consciousness are deep, concealed in an implicit form, often hiding themselves under the mask of the development of reason, its ascent to the new, etc. Here, at the intellectual platforms of dialogue there is a huge amount of both philosophic and general scientific work. Fundamental categories containing concealed, furtive errors of consciousness require particular attention. Not less important are the categories of their antipodes, overthrowing them. There is a good deal of work on the errors of consciousness!

Work on the errors of consciousness allows taking a closer look at the categories, which naturally act as the carriers of consciousness errors (authority, hypocrisy, etc.). And at the same time there appear the categories correcting the errors of consciousness (compromise, justice, trust, tolerance, etc.). All of this is incorporated in the new ethical formulations of the problem field of dialogue, and the discourse on a set of categories, both distorting and correcting consciousness, is in fact on the agenda already. Thereby the grounds are prepared for a thorough inventory of the categories, for formation of new categories and concepts, which the new Universe will be built on.

But at the same time another problem appears and manifests itself!

The evolution of reason is incremental but the “modern” world needs the primitive! Where to get and what to do? Ideologists know! This is their specialty! They put reason to sleep, turn off common sense, fill consciousness with hallucinations, ideologies, ideas, etc., scalding reason till it reaches acceptable, “necessary!” level (well, for example, till it reaches the feeling of happiness and joy from free work for the “employer” (state, corporation, etc.), being hungry, sick and poor all the while! Ideologists have an opinion that this makes the sense of high humanitarian technologies. They are many and various. They are in keen demand. Ideologists satisfy it (not for free, of course!)