Партнерка на США и Канаду по недвижимости, выплаты в крипто
- 30% recurring commission
- Выплаты в USDT
- Вывод каждую неделю
- Комиссия до 5 лет за каждого referral
Main challenges regarding improvement of the quality of education
Main challenges and support needed
Table 16.
Respondent | Main Challenge | Support |
At the level of educational organization | Providing a supportive educational environment at the state level | Public private partnership. |
State regulations and monitoring in the field of e-learning on the part of the Ministry of Education. | ||
Legislative support from the state. | ||
Tthe adoption by the Government and the State Duma of documents aimed at the actual improvement of the quality of education, rather than on the "reform" | ||
A shortage of qualified teachers | Financial support for the creation and implementation of government programs to support graduate students and young scientists working in universities | |
Promotion | More active involvement of employers in the development and implementation of educational programs, encouraging students | |
Entering university in the number of higher education institutions supporting the regional economy. | ||
Granting greater autonomy university | ||
Save the status of federal state budgetary institution | ||
Cooperation with educational institutions of different regions | ||
Financing | Funding from the Russian Federation Ministry of Education and Science, including on the development of material and technical bases | |
Increasing the share of high school extra-budgetary revenues | ||
Logistical support enterprise-consumers in creating a learning environment and increasing teachers' salaries | ||
At the level of individual teachers and university staff | Providing a supportive educational environment at the state level | Regulatory and methodological support, material and moral incentives. |
Training of teachers and other staff of universities | Information and methodological support | |
Strengthening the system of training and stimulation of teachers involved in the creation of high-quality educational resources, support for research activities | ||
The organization of educational process | Staff involvement in the management processes and the organization of educational process | |
Involve employees in the development of additional education | ||
Financing | Maintaining salaries of teachers at a decent level. | |
Improving teacher status and level of income | ||
Financial support of the educational process | ||
Grant support of the best educational practices | ||
Material and technical, personnel and financial support of the enterprises of employers and training customers. | ||
The money for the creation of conditions to attract and retain qualified personnel in rural areas through the growth of living standards of the rural population, the implementation of major investment projects in the rural areas through social guarantees of the state | ||
Addressing teachers to reduce the load |
Conclusion: The greatest emphasis respondents made for financial support from the state - both in relation to educational institutions in general and with respect to private individuals (teachers and trainers). Universities have also expressed support for the insistence in promoting and organizing cooperation with employers and other institutions of higher education, which is amazing - they seem to be able to achieve this themselves. And universities, and teachers / trainers wishing to receive support in the field of education and training - both informational and methodological and normative-methodical at the state level. Teachers / trainers are counting on greater involvement in the management and organization of educational process in their educational institutions.
Table 17.
Respondent | Main Challenge | Support |
6 | Provide teacher training | Support and encouragement of self-improvement of teachers in the context of current trends in the education market (knowledge of the needs of all stakeholders, a high level of knowledge of foreign languages) |
3 | Competence in modern educational technology, particularly in active and interactive, electronic and open in design-oriented. | |
1 | Before the teachers there are challenges associated with the constant transition from one standard to another (ФГОС6, ФГОС+, professional). This will require to become "closer" to the advanced production, the main customers for the account of their professional standards in teaching for the formation of the required competencies. | |
1 | Constant innovation and mentoring young teachers | |
1 | The manifestation of activity in the conduct of research and methodological support of educational process | |
1 | Inclusion of scientific and educational activity of the teacher in the program of development of the enterprise-employer | |
1 | Participation in internship programs | |
1 | Morality | Under constant load growth and reduce wages, remain faithful to high school |
3 | The organization and management of educational process and educational organization | Competence in the field of quality management. |
3 | Performing duties | |
2 | Implementation techniques of system analysis assessing the quality of teaching staff of professional activity. | |
2 | A more active involvement in the educational process of representatives of business, government agencies and others. | |
2 | Manifestation abilities and initiative on the part of the teaching staff | |
1 | Increasing the integrated management of all sectors and professions of product life cycle and systems for which they are willing to train. | |
1 | Complex solution of quality problems | |
1 | Improving the efficiency of the educational organization | Improving the quality of scientific work of teachers, the commercialization of scientific developments and their introduction into production. |
Conclusion: The findings of this study section in common with the conclusions of the previous section (the necessary support measures). So, the main challenges associated with the involvement of teachers and the necessary support measures are to ensure teachers. The second significant group of challenges relates to the field of organization and management of the educational process and the educational organization, especially to quality management and resolution of quality problems.
I would like to take part in the implementation of the model CQAF-VET and related standards and requirements, as well as improving them. In my opinion most of the questions does not give an adequate idea of the quality of education in educational institutions. The results of this survey to all respondents will be in the "4-5" zone. In assessing the quality of teaching staff and managers of professional activity can not be limited to indirect evaluation of quality of educational activity of the university department or the final results, citing the fact that "there are no good results from a weak leader." Unfortunately, in practice it just so happens. Necessarily it is necessary to evaluate the actual (ie directly) the quality of professional work of teachers and the way, to the same calls us to a new professional standard for teachers and education managers. To implement the educational process management system to ensure high quality requires more hard work with every teacher that he realized a part of this system. University Management should take responsibility to lead the process and continually demonstrate it. Otherwise, the quality management system will remain only on paper and the high quality of education can be forgotten (from personal experience).
Conclusion on the use EQAVET indicators and CQAF VET indicators
Decisions and key indicators of the quality education at nation level in the Russian Federation
Generally the process of guaranteeing quality education in Russia is realized in two consistent stages: managing the process of professional competencies formation and provisioning comprehensible and boundaryless procedures of independent evaluation and recognition of the quality of education results.
The basic document for regulating the education activity is the federal law “On Education in Russian Federation” No. FZ – 273 adopted on December, 29, 2012. The quality of education governs the quality of education via licensing, control and state accreditation. The key indicators of state accreditation are the education curriculum, the quality of education, information and methodology provision of learning process, facilities and resources, students social support, a spectrum of basic education programs that are being implemented, opportunity to acquire post-graduate and further professional education, research, science and methodology support, well-qualified faculty.
|
Из за большого объема этот материал размещен на нескольких страницах:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 |


