Рабочая программа дисциплины Технологии государственного управления (Tools of Public Administration) (стр. 3 )

Методические указания студентам по освоению дисциплины

8.1.1 Общие замечания

Данная дисциплина является одной из завершающих при освоении бакалаврской программы. Она основана на базовых знаниях по государственному и муниципальному управлению и не предполагает повторения ключевых тематик, изученных ранее. Если вы чувствуете пробелы в знание или понимании тех или иных тем, воспользуйтесь общими учебниками по государственному и муниципальному управлению (например, Система государственного и муниципального управления. Разделы I и II: Учеб-но-методическое пособие / СПб. филиал ГУ-ВШЭ. - СПб.: Ютас, 2010 или Основные технологии современного государственного управления. М. : НИУ ВШЭ, 2013).

Дисциплина читается на английском языке. Участие в дискуссиях очень важно для освоения дисциплины. Если вам требуется дополнительный материал по тем или иным разделам или сложно воспринимать устную речь, сообщите об этом преподавателю – вам будет предложено альтернативное освоение дисциплины, основанное на чтении и реферировании литературы.

Опоздание на аудиторные занятия не приветствуется. Разговоры по мобильному телефону не допускается.

8.1.2 Общение с преподавателем

Пожалуйста, все вопросы, предложения или просьбы, касающиеся занятий, заданий или любых других аспектов курса пишите на почту anna. *****@***com. В теме письма укажите, пожалуйста, «Tools of PA – и коротко суть вопроса». Студенты призваны демонстрировать понимание этических стандартов письменной коммуникации. Подробнее см.: http://www. /netiquette/corerules. html.

8.1.3 Групповое задание

Значительная часть оценки зависит от успешности выполнения группового задания. Пожалуйста, принимайте активное участие в работе группы при подготовке каждого из предложенных заданий. Руководитель группы будет оценивать вашу работу (по его или ее желанию, эти оценки могут не высказываться публично).

Групповое портфолио в данном курсе – это, по сути, портфолио использования современных технологий государственного администрирования в той или иной стране мира.  Поэтому я призываю приводить как можно больше конкретных примеров, а также соотносить возможности и ограничения потенциального использования той или иной технологии в России.

Рассматривая каждую из охваченных в курсе технологий, вы должны быть в состоянии ответить на 7 вопросов:

1) в чем состоит суть этой технологии?

2) является ли она традиционной или инновационной?

3) связана ли она с прямым или непрямым администрированием?

4) требует ли данная технология применения ИКТ?

5) сколько стоит внедрение этой технологии?

6) какой эффект она может оказать на управление обществом?

7) применяется ли данная технология в РФ или какие выгоды и ограничения могут возникнуть при ее внедрении?

8.1.4 Плагиат

Плагиат в письменных работах является неприемлемым. Подробнее о политике НИУ ВШЭ в данной области см.: http://www. hse. ru/studyspravka/plagiat.

8.2.1 Учебно-методическая литература для самостоятельной работы студентов

Все источники из списка литературы к каждой теме (см. раздел 7 данной программы) необходимы к прочтению. Они доступны либо в электронных ресурсах НИУ ВШЭ, либо на других интернет-ресурсах. В ряде случаев тексты будут выдаваться преподавателем. Каждый источник из списка литературы снабжен референтом доступа.

Оценочные средства для текущего контроля и аттестации студента Тематика заданий текущего контроля

9.1.1 Примеры терминов для терминологического диктанта (контрольной работы)

Term	Definition
Agenda 21	A sustainable development program run by the United Nations (UN), consisting of a comprehensive blueprint of action to be taken globally, nationally and locally by organizations of the UN, governments, and major groups in every area in which humans impact on the environment. The number 21 refers to the 21st century.
Benchmarking	Management process used and particularly in strategy evaluation, where organizations evaluate various aspects of their strengths or performance in relation to common industry practices, usually against peer organizations. Eden scans for analogous benchmarks across countries, industries, and functions, in order to develop breakthrough gold standards for its clients.
Civil Society	Any non-government organization or institution that represents the collective will or interests of citizens; most organizations are either non-profits or lobbyists
Crowd Funding	A method of funding projects or ideas by appealing to a large number of donors, often via Internet-based systems.
Crowdsourcing	A method to seek proposals for solving problems with the contributions from many parties, often via internet-based systems.
E-government	The use of information communication technologies such as the Internet by government to facilitate in the operation of government. Also called electronic government or digital government.
E-participation	The use of information communication technologies such as the Internet by government to enable and support citizen participation in government
Foresight development	Improving our human ability to think about the future and to act effectively now to build a better future. Foresight development thus includes futures studies plus foresighted thinking and behaviors. Assumes that the human response to the future is both a mental/psychological skill that can be improved (like hindsight or insight) and a set of behavior habits (like organizing, predicting, planning, investing, insurance, etc.) that can be strengthened with study and practice.
Information Asymmetry	A situation where the parties entering into a contract have access to different information in advance.
Information Policy	The laws, regulations, and policies that regulate the flow of information i. e. the use, distribution, creation, and access of information
Open Data	Data that is free from legal or technical restrictions; data that can be freely used, reused, and redistributed
Smart City	A city can be defined as ‘smart’ when investments in human and social capital and traditional (transport) and modern (ICT) communication infrastructure fuel sustainable economic development and a high quality of life, with a wise management of natural resources, through participatory action and engagement. The smart city concept essentially means efficiency. But efficiency based on the intelligent management and integrated ICTs, and active citizen participation. Then implies a new kind of governance, genuine citizen involvement in public policy.
Social Return on Investment (SROI)	Measures the social and financial value created by a nonprofit, NGO or business. SROI is an approach to understanding and managing the impacts of a project, an organization or a policy. It is based on stakeholders and puts financial values on the important impacts identified by stakeholders, which do not have market values.
Structural Transformation	Changes in the composition of the economy occurring as the society changes, and markets, industries and social sectors emerge, transform or disappear.
Sustainable development	Resource utilization that aims to meet human needs while preserving the environment so that such needs may also be met in future stainable development ties social challenges with concern for the carrying capacity of natural systems.

9.1.2 Примерная структура портфолио (окончательный вариант выдается студентам на первом аудиторном занятии):

1. Анализ странового кейса по теме Tools of public budgeting;

2. Анализ странового кейса по теме Management tools in public administration;

3. Анализ странового кейса по теме Public programs

4. Анализ странового кейса по теме Tools of indirect governance

5. Анализ странового кейса по теме Tools for Digital Government

6. Анализ странового кейса по теме Social tools of public administration

7. Опыт лучших практик: возможности и ограничения внедрения опыта страны Х в современной России.

Вопросы для оценки качества освоения дисциплины

Тестовые задания охватывают следующие тематики:

Instrumental approach to political economics and governance. Direct and indirect governance. Budget and Government Revenue Systems. Russian Federal Budget Overview. Performance budgeting and participatory budgeting. Balanced scorecard and post-budget integration techniques. Planned Programmed Budgeting System (PPBS). Zero Base Budgeting (ZBB). Streamlining budget options (RCB). Activity based budgeting. Gender-responsive budgeting (GRB). Expenditure tracking and participatory performance monitoring. Public administration and public management. PODSCORB: classic view of administrative management. Benchmarking in public administration and public policy. Program impact theory. Program Structure. Program design and implementation. The overview of the public programs in Russia and abroad. Infrastructure and planning process steps. Administrative decentralization: deconcentration, devolution, delegation. Cooptation, orchestration and trusteeship. Corporate governance. Citizenship education. Digital tools in public administration. Expert systems in government. Open government and E-government. Government as an open-data provider. Social media as a tool for the formation of the open government. Mobile technologies: mobile money, e-health and MGovernment service delivery. GIS technology and geospatial analytics for the improvement of the city planning processes. Crowdsourcing and collaboration technologies. Foresight as a basis for strategic planning of urban mon Assessment Framework (CAF) as a quality management tool in public administration. Public program evaluation. Experimental and non-experimental evaluation designs. Qualitative and quantitative data. Citizen Report Card Surveys. Delphi method. The assessment of ethics and human subjects of the public administration tools. Self-assessment in public organizations and tools for public servants motivations
Учебно-методическое и информационное обеспечение дисциплины Основная литература Chun, S., Shulman, S., Sandoval, R., and Hovy, E. 2010. Government 2.0: Making Connections between Citizens, Data and Government. Information Polity 15 (1): 1. (HSE Electronic Resources: JSTOR) Ganapati, S. 2011. Uses of Public Participation Geographic Information Systems Applications in E-Government. Public Administration Review 71 (3), p. 425–34. (HSE Electronic Resources: Wiley Online Library) Janssen, M., Charalabidis, Y., and Zuiderwijk, A. 2012. Benefits, Adoption Barriers and Myths of Open Data and Open Government. Information Systems Management 29 (4), p. 258–68.  (HSE Electronic Resources: Taylor&Francis Online) Linders, D. 2012. From E-Government to We-Government: Defining a Typology for Citizen Coproduction in the Age of Social Media. Government Information Quarterly, 29 (4), p. 446–54.  (HSE Electronic Resources: Science Direct). Mladen, D., Milosevic D., Filipovic, J., and Ristic, S. 2013. Benchmarking as a Quality Management Tool in Public Administration. Engineering Economics 24 (4).  .  (HSE Electronic Resources: Taylor&Francis Online). Peters, B. G. 2010. The Politics of Bureaucracy: An Introduction to Comparative Public Administration. 6 edition. Abingdon ; New York: Routledge. Public administration in post-Communist countries: former Soviet Union, Central and Eastern Europe, and Mongolia. 2013 / Saltanat, Liebert, Stephen E., Condrey, D. V. Goncharov. – Boca Raton: CRC Press. Sanina, A. peting for a Citizen: ‘Visible’ and ‘invisible’ Forms of State Identity in Russia. Journal of Eurasian Studies 3 (2): 126–46.  (HSE Electronic Resources: Science Direct) Дополнительная литература Ahonen, P. 2014. Administrative Research in a Neoinstitutionalist Perspective: Finland, Calling for Globalization, and the Rehabilitation of Public Administration. Administration & Society 46: 747-74. Al-Badi, A. H. 2014. The adoption of social media in government agencies: Gulf Cooperation Council case study. Journal of Technology Research, 5(10), 26. Altshuler,  A. 1997. Bureaucratic Innovation, Democratic Accountability, and Political Incentives. In: Altshuler. A. and Behn, R. (eds.) Innovation in American Government. Brookings Institution: Washington. Altshuler, A. and Zegans, M. 1997. Innovation and Public Management: Notes from the State House and City Hall. In: Altshuler. A. and Behn, R. (eds.) Innovation in American Government. Brookings Institution: Washington. Azizi, A. 2012. Public administration education: The case of Macedonian universities. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 1436-1441.  Barzelay, M. and Armajani, B. 1997. Innovation in the Concept of Government Operations: a new paradigm for staff agencies. In: Altshuler. A. and Behn, R. (eds.) Innovation in American Government. Brookings Institution: Washington. Behn, R. 1998. Leadership Counts : Lessons for Public Managers from the Massachusetts Welfare, Training, and Employment Program. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA.  Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., Hansen, D. 2012. The impact of polices on government social media usage: Issues, challenges, and recommendations. Government Information Quarterly, 29, 30-40. Brabham, D. 2009. Crowdsourcing the Public Participation Process for Planning Projects. Planning Theory 8 (3), p. 242–62. (HSE Electronic Resources: SAGE). Breen, J. 2000. GIS in Emergency Management Cultures. Mississippi: Mississippi State University. Cepiku D., Mussari R., Poggesi S., Reichard C. 2012. Governance of networks: challenges and future issues from a public management perspective. Editorial of the special issue, The Journal of Management and Governance, vol. online first, ISSN: 1385- 3457, doi: 10.1007/s10997-012-9236-3. Chalekian, P. 2013. POSDCORB: Core Patterns of Administration. – Proceedings of the 20th Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs, PLoP’13 (link) Chambers, D., and Bonk J. F. 2012. Social Policy and Social Programs: A Method for the Practical Public Policy Analyst. 6 edition. Boston: Pearson. (Selective chapters will be provided by the lecturer in the print version). Chen, G., Wiekart L., Williams, D. 2014. Budget Tools: Financial Methods in the Public Sector. Second edition. CQ Press. (Selective chapters will be provided by the lecturer in the print version). Chen, S. 2009. Corporate Responsibilities in Internet-Enabled Social Networks. Journal of Business Ethics, 10, 523-536. Connor, S. J. 1995. Using GIS for decision-support in National Development Planning. Development in Practice, 4. pp. 356-360. Dawes, S. S. 2008. The Evolution and Continuing Challenges of E-Governance. Public Administration Review, 68, S86-S102. Dunleavy, P. 2007. Governance and state organization in the digital era. In: R. Mansell et al (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Information and Communication Technologies (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 404-426.  Eikenberry, A. M. 2012. Social Networking, Learning, and Civic Engagement: New Relationships between Professors and Students, Public Administrators and Citizens. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 18(3), 449-466. Evans-Cowley, J. S. 2010. Planning in the age of Facebook: the role of social networking in planning processes. GeoJournal, 75(5), 407-420. Farmer, D. 2002. New York and the ‘P’ in POSDCORB. Administrative Theory & Praxis. 24 (1). p. 225-230. (HSE Electronic Resources: JSTOR). Goldsmith, S. and Eggers W. D. 2004. Governing by Network: The New Shape of the Public Sector. Brookings Institution Press: Washington, D. C.  Gunasekaran A., Gupta K.. 2007. Benchmarking in Public Administration and Public Policy. In Encyclopedia of Public Administration and Public Policy, Second Edition (Print Version), 141–46. CRC Press. (link) Hong, H. 2013. Government websites and social media’s influence on government-public relationships. Public Relations Review, 39, 346-356. Hout, W., Robison, R. 2008. Governance and the Depoliticisation of Development. Routledge. (Google Books). Huibo, Z. and Bingwen, Z. parison of Government Functions of BRIC in “National Innovation System” From the Degree of Homoplasy and Embeddedness. in Li Yang (ed.). BRICs & The Global Transformation-Consideration on the BRICs Summit of Think Tanks in Brasilia, Social Sciences Academic Press(China), pp.139-165. Improving Public Organisations through Self-Assessment. 2013. CAF Report. (link) Kapucu, N. 2007. New Public Management: Theory, Ideology, and Practice. Ed. Farazmand, Ali and Jack Pinkowski. Handbook of Globalization and Public Administration. New York: Taylor & Francis. Pp. 889-902. Kennedy, Kerry J. 1997. Citizenship Education and the Modern State. Taylor & Francis. (Google Books) Klapper, L. F., and Love, I. 2004. Corporate Governance, Investor Protection, and Performance in Emerging Markets. Journal of Corporate Finance 10 (5), p. 703–28. (HSE Electronic Resources:  JSTOR). Kunis, R. Rünger, G. and Schwind M. 2007. A Model for Document Management in e-Government Systems Based on Hierarchical Process Folders. The Electronic Journal of e-Government. Volume 5 Issue 2, pp 191 – 204. (link) McNabb, D. E. 2006. Knowledge Management in the Public Sector: A Blueprint for Innovation in Government. London: Routledge. McNabb, D. E. 2013. Research methods in public administration and nonprofit management: quantitative and qualitative approaches. 3rd ed. New York: M. E. Shape. Mergel, I. & Greeves, W. 2012. Social Media in the Public Sector Field Guide: Designing and Implementing Strategies and Policies, Jossey-Bass/Wiley, San Francisco, CA. Murray, M. 2009. An Instrumental Approach to Political Economics. Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, Vol. 3 No. 1. (link) Musell R. 2009. Understanding Government Budgets: A Practical Guide. London: Routledge. (Selective chapters will be provided by the lecturer in the print version). Nye Jr., Joseph S., Philip D. Zelikow, David C. King (eds.) 1997. Why People Don't Trust Government. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA. Okabe, M. From Traditional ‘“Policy” to Social Programs.” 2007. Policy and Governance Working Paper Series No.125. Keio University, Japan. (link) Pirog, M. (Ed.). 2008. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management Classics Series: Social experimentation, program evaluation, and public policy. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. (Selective chapters will be provided by the lecturer in the print version). Rosenbloom, D.,  Kravchuk, R.,  Clerkin, R. Public Administration: Understanding Management, Politics, and Law in the Public Sector. 2014. 8 edition. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education. (Selective chapters will be provided by the lecturer in the print version). Salamon, L. 2000. The New Governance and the Tools of Public Action: An Introduction, 28 Fordham Urban Law Journal 1611. Volume 28, Issue 5 (link) Schneider, A. 2003. Decentralization: Conceptualization and Measurement. Studies in Comparative International Development. 38 (3), p. 32–56. (HSE Electronic Resources: Springer) Shahkooh, K., Abdollahi, A., Fasanghari, M., and Azadnia, M. 2009. A Foresight Based Framework for E-Government Strategic Planning. Journal of Software 4 (6).  (link) Sodani, P., and Sharma, S. 2008. Gender Responsive Budgeting. Journal of Health Management, 10, 2, p. 227–240. (link). Wagle, S., and P. Shah. 2004. Report Cards: A General Note on Methodology. Social Development Department. World Bank Group. (link) Wilson, James Q. 1989. Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It. New York: Basic Books. Wu, H.,& He, J. 2009. Paradigm Shift in Public Administration: Implications for Teaching in Professional Training Programs. Public Administration Review, 69, 21-28. Yves, S., Herzberg, C., and Rцcke. A. 2008. Participatory Budgeting in Europe: Potentials and Challenges. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 32 (1), p. 164–78. (HSE Electronic Resources: Wiley Online Library) Zegans, M. 1997. The Dilemma of the Modern Public Manager: Satisfying the Virtues of Scientific and Innovative Management. In: Altshuler. A. and Behn, R. (eds.) Innovation in American Government. Brookings Institution: Washington. Ресурсы информационно-телекоммуникационной сети «Интернет»

European Innovation Partnership on Smart Cities and Communities Operational Implementation Plan http://ec. europa. eu/eip/smartcities/files/operational-implementation-plan-oip-v2_en. pdf