Приложение 3. Процент акций, по которым была отклонена гипотеза о случайном блуждании (RW3) по результатам теста Ло-МакКинли.
=0,98
Предположения | [1] | [2] | [3] | [4] | [5] | [6] | [7] | [8] | [9] | [10] | [11] | [12] |
1% | 74 | 54 | 1 | 56 | 0 | 57 | 75 | 73 | 73 | 72 | 67 | 69 |
5% | 75 | 28 | 2 | 41 | 0 | 41 | 69 | 70 | 68 | 70 | 73 | 70 |
10% | 77 | 19 | 2 | 41 | 0 | 36 | 72 | 71 | 71 | 74 | 80 | 79 |
25% | 79 | 8 | 3 | 50 | 0 | 32 | 79 | 75 | 73 | 91 | 92 | 92 |
50% | 68 | 2 | 5 | 85 | 0 | 23 | 90 | 85 | 83 | 90 | 86 | 85 |
75% | 77 | 2 | 8 | 50 | 0 | 30 | 89 | 90 | 91 | 84 | 79 | 76 |
90% | 81 | 0 | 17 | 30 | 0 | 41 | 82 | 86 | 87 | 75 | 71 | 70 |
95% | 81 | 0 | 24 | 32 | 0 | 49 | 75 | 78 | 79 | 71 | 65 | 63 |
99% | 74 | 1 | 44 | 44 | 0 | 60 | 69 | 72 | 71 | 66 | 62 | 61 |
с | 79 | 11 | 10 | 14 | 72 | 39 | 60 | 62 | 61 | 54 | 52 | 53 |
Составлено по: Thomsons Reuters Datastream
Приложение 4. Процент акций, по которым была отклонена гипотеза о случайном блуждании (RW3) по результатам теста Ло-МакКинли.
=0,97
Предположения | [1] | [2] | [3] | [4] | [5] | [6] | [7] | [8] | [9] | [10] | [11] | [12] |
1% | 74 | 44 | 0 | 50 | 0 | 51 | 75 | 73 | 73 | 72 | 67 | 69 |
5% | 75 | 30 | 0 | 37 | 0 | 39 | 69 | 70 | 68 | 70 | 73 | 70 |
10% | 77 | 21 | 1 | 39 | 0 | 32 | 72 | 71 | 71 | 74 | 80 | 79 |
25% | 79 | 8 | 2 | 50 | 0 | 28 | 79 | 75 | 73 | 91 | 92 | 92 |
50% | 68 | 2 | 5 | 79 | 0 | 19 | 90 | 85 | 83 | 90 | 86 | 85 |
75% | 77 | 1 | 5 | 43 | 0 | 27 | 89 | 90 | 91 | 84 | 79 | 76 |
90% | 81 | 0 | 16 | 28 | 0 | 37 | 82 | 86 | 87 | 75 | 71 | 70 |
95% | 81 | 0 | 28 | 32 | 0 | 53 | 75 | 78 | 79 | 71 | 65 | 63 |
99% | 74 | 0 | 39 | 42 | 0 | 56 | 69 | 72 | 71 | 66 | 62 | 61 |
с | 79 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 59 | 31 | 60 | 62 | 61 | 54 | 52 | 53 |
Составлено по: Thomsons Reuters Datastream
1 Fama, E. (1965). The Behavior of Stock Market Prices / E. Fama // Journal of Business. – 1965. – Vol. 38 – P. 34–105
2Barberis, N. A survey of behavioral finance / N. Barberis and Richard Thaler // Handbook of the Economics of Finance. – 2003. – P. 1053–1128.
3Kahneman, D. Prospect theory: An analysis of Decision under Risk / D. Kahneman, A. Tversky // Econometrica. – 1979. – Vol. 47 № 2. – P. 263-291.
4 Kahneman, D. Choices, values and frames / D. Kahneman, A. Tversky // American Psychologist. – 1984. – Vol. 39 № 4. – P. 341–350.
5Abreu, M. Individual investors’ behavioral biases / M. Abreu // Teaching Economics Working Paper. – 2014.
6Koenker, R. Regression quantiles / R. Koenker, G. Bassett // Econometrica. – 1978. – Vol. 46 № 1. – P. 33–50.
7Koenker, R. Quantile autoregression / R. Koenker, Z. Xiao // Journal of the American Statistical Association. – 2006. – Vol. 101 № 000. – P. 980–990.
8Rahman, O. Investors' Irrationality In The Predictability Of Stock Returns and Forecasting Its VaR Using Quantile Regression / O. Rahman // Working Paper, York University. – 2016.
9Barberis, N. A survey of behavioral finance / N. Barberis and Richard Thaler // Handbook of the Economics of Finance. – 2003. – P. 1053–1128.
10Statman, M. Behavioral finance: Finance with normal people / M. Statman // Borsa Istanbul Review. – 2014. – Vol. 14 № 2. – P. 1-9.
11Barberis, N. A survey of behavioral finance / N. Barberis and Richard Thaler // Handbook of the Economics of Finance. – 2003. – P. 1053–1128.
12Friedman, M. The Case for Flexible Exchange Rates / M. Friedman. // Essays in Positive Economics. – University of Chicago Press, 1953. – P. 157-203
13Barberis, N. A survey of behavioral finance / N. Barberis and Richard Thaler // Handbook of the Economics of Finance. – 2003. – P. 1053–1128.
14Kahneman, D. Prospect theory: An analysis of Decision under Risk / D. Kahneman, A. Tversky // Econometrica. – 1979. – Vol. 47 № 2. – P. 263-291.
15Канеман, Д. Думай медленно… решай быстро / Д. Канеман — Москва: АСТ, 2014. — 653 с.
16Kahneman, D. Prospect theory: An analysis of Decision under Risk / D. Kahneman, A. Tversky // Econometrica. – 1979. – Vol. 47 № 2. – P. 263-291.
17 Hirshleifer, D. Investor Psychology and Asset Pricing / D. Hirshleifer // Journal of Finance. – 2001. – Vol. 56 № 4. – P. 1534-1597.
18Trivers, R. Deceit and Self-deception / R. Trivers // Man and Beast Revisited. / R. Robinson and L. Tiger. — Smithsonian Press. — 1991. — 175–191.
19Hirshleifer, J. On the Emotions as Guarantors of Threats and Promises / J. Hirshleifer // The Latest on the Best: Essays on Evolution and Optimality. / J. Dupre. — MIT Press. — 1987. — P. 305–326.
20Kahneman, D. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases / D. Kahneman, A. Tversky // Cambridge University Press. – 1982.
21Abreu, M. Individual investors’ behavioral biases / M. Abreu // Teaching Economics Working Paper. – 2014.
22Shiller, R. J. Bubbles, Human judgements, and expert opinion [Электронный ресурс] / R. J. Shiller // Cowles Foundation discussion paper № 000. – Режим доступа: http://cowles. yale. edu/sites/default/files/files/pub/d13/d1303.pdf (дата обращения: 02.04.2017).
23Daniel, K. Investor psychology in capital markets: Evidence and policy implications / K. Daniel, D. Hirshleifer, S. H. Teoh // Journal of Monetary Economics. – 2002. – Vol. 49 № 1. – P. 139-209.
24Barber, B. All That Glitters: The Effect of Attention and News on the Buying Behavior of Individual and Institutional Investors / B. Barber and T. Odean // The Review of Financial Studies. – 2008. – Vol. 21, № 2. – P. 785-818.
25Abreu, M. Individual investors’ behavioral biases / M. Abreu // Teaching Economics Working Paper. – 2014.
26Kahneman, D. Choices, values and frames / D. Kahneman, A. Tversky // American Psychologist. – 1984. – Vol. 39 № 4. – P. 341–350.
27Канеман, Д. Думай медленно… решай быстро / Д. Канеман — Москва: АСТ, 2014. — 653 с.
28Kahneman D., Tversky A. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge, England. Cambridge University Press. 1982.
|
Из за большого объема этот материал размещен на нескольких страницах:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 |


