Современные подходы к оцениванию политики в России (стр. 16 )

21одели экспериментов в социальной психологии и прикладных исследований. СПб., Социально-психологический центр, 1996 г.; Pawson, Ray & Tilley, Nick, Realistic Evaluation, London: Sage Publications, 2006; Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., Freeman, H. E., Evaluation: A Systematic Approach, 7th ed., Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 2004; Winter, Soren C. Implementation Perspectives: Status and Reconsideration, in: Handbook of Public Administration / Peters G. and Pierre J., London etc.: Sage, 2003, pp. 212 ff.; Clarke, John, Scrutiny through inspection and audit: Policies, structures and processes, in: Public Management and Governance // Bovaird T. & Loeffler E., London/New York: Routledge, 2003, pp. 149 ff;

22 Mertens D. M., Wilson A. T. Program evaluation theory and practice: a comprehensive guide. NewYork, N. Y.: GuilfordPress. 2012. P. 451-452.

23 Abbott M. L. The program evaluation prism: using statistical methods to discover patterns. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010. P. 34-36.

24 Состояние и динамика трудовой и научно-инновационной сфер Российской Федерации: статистический анализ и оценивание / , , . Ростов-на-Дону: Изд-воРГЭУ (РИНХ), 2013. C. 56-61; Etkin C., Coutts B. Public agenda online: the inside source for public opinion and policy analysis // Library Journal. 2003. Vol. 128. N 7. P. 43.

25Grembowski D. The practice of health program evaluation / Second edition. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications 2016. P. 45-49; Fitzpatrick J. L. Program evaluation: alternative approaches and practical guidelines / Jody L. Fitzpatrick, James R. Sanders, Blaine R. Worthen; 4th ed. UpperSaddleRiver, N. J. :PearsonEducation, 2011. P. 11-12.

26Parsons D. W. [Book review] Public policy, an introduction to the theory and practice of policy analysis // Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. 1997. Vol. 16. P. 176-178; The program evaluation standards: a guide for evaluators and evaluation users / Ed. D. B. Yarbrough; 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, Calif. : SAGE, 2011. P. 41-45; Langbein L. I. Public program evaluation: a statistical guide / 2nd ed. Armonk, N. Y. : M. E. Sharpe, 2012. P. 23-26.

27Niskanen W. A. Policy analysis and public choice / Selected papers. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2004. P. 45-46; Handbook of practical program evaluation / Ed. K. E. Newcomer, H. P. Hatry, J. S. Wholey; Fourth edition. Hoboken, NJ: Jossey-Bass, 2015. P. 67-78.

28Handbook on the theory and practice of program evaluation / Ed. A. N. Link, N. S. Vonortas. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2013. P. 78-81; Fitzpatrick J. L. Sanders J. R., Worthen B. R. Program evaluation: alternative approaches and practical guidelines / 4 ed. Boston; Munich: Pearson Education. 2012. P. 43-45.

29Barzelay M. Gallego R. The comparative historical analysis of public management policy cycles in France, Italy, and Spain: symposium introduction // Governance. 2010. Vol. 23. N 2. P. 209-223; Schober S., Bergsmann C., Evelyn B. Program Evaluation // International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. 2012. P. 324-326; Program evaluation: an introduction / 5th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning., 2010. P. 45-47.

Abbott M. L. The program evaluation prism: using statistical methods to discover patterns. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010. 310 p.

30Anderson J. Public Policymaking: An Introduction. Boston, 1994. 340 p.

Kuhlman S. Evaluation of Local Government Modernization: Implementation and Effects of the „New Steering Model“ in German Municipalitie. 2004. P. 23-24; Martin S., Sanderson I. Evaluating Public Policy Experiments. Measuring Outcomes, Monitoring Processes or Managing Pilots? // Evaluation. 1999 Vol. 5(3). P. 78-81; Huey T. Ch. Practical program evaluation: theory-driven evaluation and the integrated evaluation perspective; Mercer University, Second edition. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications, 2015. P. 67-69.

31 еформа государственного управления. Международный опыт. М.: Весьмир, 2003. C. 67-68; Bemelmans-Videc M. L. Evaluation in The Netherlands 1990-2000. 2002. P,. 10-11; Kuipers H. Richardson R. Active Qualitative Evaluation: Core Elements and Procedures // Evaluation. 1999.Vol. 5(1). P. 25-31.

32 Процесс принятия и осуществления решений в публично-государственной политике: динамический цикл и его основные фазы // Политанализ. Ру. 2004 [Электронный ресурс]. Режим доступа: http://politanaliz. ru/articles_473.html (01.05.2016); Бюрократия для XXI века? Модели государственной службы. Россия, США, Англия, Австралия. М.: Дело, 2002. C. 167-169; Kuhlman S. Performance Measurement and Performance Comparison in German Local Governments. 2004. P. 45-46.

33Davies I. C. Evaluation and Performance Management in Government // Evaluation, 1999. Vol. 5(2). P. 46-51; ценивание политик и измерение результативности: мировой опыт и российские перспективы оценивания эффективности государственного управления [Электронный ресурс]. Режим доступа: http://www. iopp. ru/pub/Eval_performance%20measurement. doc (01.05.2016).

34RhodesR. A.W. Understanding Governance. Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability. Buchingham, 1999. P. 16-17; Wollmann H. Public sector reform and evaluation. Approaches and practice in international perspective // Evaluation in Public Sector Reform. Concepts and Practice in International Perspective, Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar, 2003. P. 55-61.

35Program evaluation [Electronic resource]: experienced agencies follow a similar model for prioritizing research: report to the Subcommittee on Oversight of Government Management, the Federal Workforce, and the District of Columbia, Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, U. S. Senate. Washington, D. C.: U. S. Govt. Accountability Office, 2011.P. 5-6; Wollmann H. Policy knowledge and contractual research — International Encyclopedia of Social and Behavioral Sciences. Vol. 5. Elsevier, 2003. P. 288-292; Spector M. J. Program Evaluation // The SAGE Encyclopedia of Educational Technology. 2011. P. 528-530.

36 Принятие политических решений. — М., 2004; Теория и практика принятия решений. — М., 1984; Теория и методы принятия решений. — М.: Логос, 2002; Политический анализ. — М.: Логос, 2002. Главы 2 и 3; Избиратель: покупатель, продавец или вкладчик? // Полис, 2001, № 6, С. 40-50. Принятие решений. Метод анализа иерархий. — М., 1993; TheDelphiMethod. Techniques and Applications / ed. H. Linstone & M. Turoff. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1975. P. 212 – 216.

37 окус группы в маркетинге и социологии. М., Издательство "ЦЕНТР", 1998 г.; и др., Оценка обучающих программ: Практическое пособие. – М.: «Грошев-Дизайн», 2002; тратегия социологического исследования. Описание, объяснение, понимание социальной реальности. М., "Добросвет", 1998; Российский политико-управленческий цикл: дефициты подходов к оцениванию // Оценка политик и новая политическая экономия: инструменты анализа экономических реформ, М.: ЦЭМИ РАН, 2006. с. 5-12; Hall, I. Evaluationandsocialresearch, PalgraveMacmillan, 2004.

38 Rubin F. A Basic Guide to Evaluation for Development Workers. Oxfam, Oxford, 1998; Patton, M. Q., Utilization Focused Evaluation. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 1997; Patton, M. Q., Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd. ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2001.

39Politt, Christopher, Public Management Reforms, 2nd enlarge ed., Oxford University Press, 2004; Wollmann, Hellmut, Evaluation in public-sector reform. Trends, potentials and limits in international perspective, in: Wollmann, Hellmut (ed.) Evaluation in Public-Sector Reform, Concepts and Practice in International Perspective, Cheltenham/Northhampton: Edward Elgar, 2003, pp. 231-258.

40 Kuhlmann S. Evaluation of research and innovation policies: a discussion of trends with examples from Germany // International Journal Technology Management, 2003, Vol. 26; Monitoring, Evaluation & Assessment Activities Overview of the EU RTD Programme Monitoring and Evaluation System ; Hong, Heung Deug & Boden, Mark, R&D programme evaluation — Theory and Practice, Ashgate Publishing, 2003; Learning from science and technology policy evaluation / Philip Shapira & Stefan Kuhlmann, Cheltenham/Northhampton: Edward Elgar, 2003.

41Consolidation and Expansion. – Furubo J.-E. Rist R. C. Sandahl R. (eds), International Atlas of Evaluation, New Brunswick and London: Transaction; Liberia Country Program Evaluation 2004-2011 [Electronic resource]: Evaluation of the World Bank Group Program. Washington, D. C.: The World Bank, 2013. P. 45; Carlsson L. Non-Hierarchical Evaluation of Policy // Evaluation. 2000 Vol. 6 (2). P. 119-121.

42Spaulding D. T. Program evaluation in practice: core concepts and examples for discussion and analysis / Second edition. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2014. P. 67-68; Langbein L. I. Public program evaluation: a statistical guide / 2nd ed. Armonk; N. Y.: M. E. Sharpe, 2012. P. 12-14; Mertens D. M. Program evaluation theory and practice: a comprehensive guide. New York, NY: Guilford Press, 2012. P. 319-322.

43 , «Таргетирование» оценки регулирующего воздействия: международные подходы и российская практика // Вопросы государственного и муниципального управления. 2015. № 4. С. 7-40.

44 Barzelay M. Gallego R. The comparative historical analysis of public management policy cycles in France, Italy, and Spain: symposium conclusion // Governance. 2010. Vol. 23. N 2. P. 297-307.

45 Spaulding D. T. Program evaluation in practice: core concepts and examples for discussion and analysis / Second edition. (s. l.): (s. n.). 2014. P. 98-99.

46 Van Der Knaap P. Performance Management and Policy Evaluation in the Netherlands // Evaluation. 2000. Vol. 6(3). P. 8-13.

47 Политический анализ: Курс лекций. М., 2005. Лекции 19-20, С. 243-271; ShapiroJ.  Evaluation: Judgement Day or Management Tool? Olive, 1996.

48 , , Оценка проектов и программ: курс лекций. Школа управления НКО. М.: ЦПНКО, 2003; Оценка проектов и программ. М., ПРЕСТО-РК, 2005.

49 Wollmann, Hellmut, Evaluation in public-sector reform: Towards a ‘third wave’ of evaluation?, in: Wollmann, Hellmut (ed.) 2003, Evaluation in Public-Sector Reform, Concepts and Practice in International Perspective,: Edward Elgar, pp. 1-11.